We performed a comparison between Fortra Tripwire IP360 and Trend Micro Deep Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Tripwire IP360 is a very stable solution."
"We could manage our entire IP range with the solution."
"It's become the pinnacle point for anything that enters the network or anything that's passing through to production to first be affected by IP360, hardened, and up to standard. For our integrity management, one was deployed in the bank about two years ago and that's still going to expand the usage and the product itself. That will go hand in hand with training and expanding the product as for where it's deployed."
"The most valuable features are web security, email filtering, and content filtering."
"We've found stability to be great so far."
"The file integrity and log inspection are game-changing features for us."
"We find that their technical support team is always accessible and willing to assist."
"The vulnerability scanning reduces false positives by quite a bit."
"It provides security and protection. The endpoint firewall is valuable."
"It is connected into an intelligence database and is quick to pick up new threats. It also reduces my workload with its speed and the protection that it provides."
"There is a degree of set it and forget it in regards to the actual endpoints and what you can do with the console, which is nice."
"I am not very impressed by the technical support."
"The reporting functions can use improvement. There is room for growth because reporting functions differ a lot depending on what you're going to output. It depends on whether it's for technical or senior management and how it's interpreted. There could be growth within the reporting functionality side."
"We need to dedicate time and resources to keep it running."
"I would like to see an EDR function for the servers, as that would be useful for us."
"The solution could use more integration."
"There is room for improvement with Trend Micro Deep Security, as there are instances where installations may need to be redone. There seem to be glitches when working with older Windows servers, such as those from 2003 or 2005, requiring us to uninstall and reinstall the product to resolve the issue."
"I think more work could be done on Deep Security's ability to handle dynamic threat scenarios."
"I would like to see better pricing. The pricing could be lower."
"I would rate tech support in the range of six to eight out of 10. Time to provide solution could be improved."
"AWS products could become more compatible with intrusion detection products leveraging help from Trend Micro."
"They are still working on the company integration from TippingPoint because this was a recent acquisition from a few years ago. So, a Tipping Point integration with Deep Security, having one single pane of glass dashboard, would provide us a simple use case."
Fortra Tripwire IP360 is ranked 37th in Vulnerability Management with 6 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 1st in Virtualization Security with 80 reviews. Fortra Tripwire IP360 is rated 7.0, while Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Fortra Tripwire IP360 writes "The solution helps users to manage their entire IP range, but it's unreliable and very expensive to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "Offers excellent endpoint protection and great stability ". Fortra Tripwire IP360 is most compared with Tenable Nessus, whereas Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Micro Apex One, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Symantec Endpoint Security and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint. See our Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Trend Micro Deep Security report.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.