We performed a comparison between SAP Process Orchestration and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."With the latest version what I find to be the most valuable are the REST, SuccessFactors, and Ariba Network adapters."
"The product has good technical support but you usually will not need it because it is quite stable."
"The solution is stable."
"It is strategically focused to forecast a global integration platform for our business."
"The solution is easy to use."
"It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs."
"I rate the product's setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy since it is a very easy process."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"The solution is scalable."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"The product roadmap suggests it will approach the end of support in several years, and a lot of innovations are now implemented by SAP not in SAP PO, but in SAP Integration Suite, hence, the platform is stable, but doesn't receive a lot of new features in recent updates."
"Data modeling is an area of concern in the product where improvements are required."
"In terms of technical support, it would be helpful if they handled the tickets a bit faster when queries are sent to them."
"SAP needs to improve a lot in terms of the orchestration part so that more adapters can be provided to users, which are areas where the solution has downsides."
"SAP Process Orchestration breaks down sometimes."
"The older version of the solution will no longer be supported."
"The solution could be more scalable."
"It does not have all of the industry-standard solutions available in PO and it is not plug and play, so we have to do a lot of development."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 22nd in Cloud Data Integration with 7 reviews. SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, SAP Data Services, webMethods Integration Server, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services and IBM B2B Integrator, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps. See our SAP Process Orchestration vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
