We performed a comparison between Salt Security and Skybox Security Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Noname Security, Salt Security, F5 and others in API Security."It's really great. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. I haven't encountered any instability issues."
"The way that it's built with three-tier architecture, it makes it very horizontally scalable, so I can have multiple fallbacks. If one machine does fall offline, there are four other machines that are doing the exact same job to pick it up"
"The most valuable features are the rule compliance and the OS vulnerability checks."
"The most valuable features are Firewall Assurance and Vulnerability Control."
"I think that compliance checks and policy compliance are the product's good features."
"The solution's simplicity of use is its most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is the compliance, whether it's access compliance or the configuration compliance, to make sure that all of our devices are configured as they're supposed to be, to limit access as much possible, to follow least-access guidelines."
"The most valuable features of Skybox Security Suite are all the modules that are provided, such as vulnerability assessments and network, and firewall assessments."
"It has a good policy management feature and can provide customers with good quality outputs."
"The integration part could be a bit extended."
"Reporting. A lot of the reports, out of the box, are limited to a certain number of either configuration violations or access rule violations. So when you first set up a new firewall to be monitored by Skybox, you don't get a real full report. You have to really tweak it to get everything."
"They are not satisfied with the complexity of the solution and the price."
"The solution needs to move improve its interface to a full web browser version that is more accessible and doesn't require installation for use."
"The solution was quite technical. It would be easier to manage if the solution was more specific about aspects of the solution and provided more advisory around how to use it effectively. It would help users a lot if they were more clear about everything."
"There is room for improvement in pricing. It would be better, especially if a customer bought all four modules."
"The solution needs improvement in firewall configuration checks. I would also like to see more configuration checks for Forcepoint and for other non-supported firewalls."
"The initial setup with Skybox Security is hard. You need one or two strong security engineers on your team."
"Modifications and the deletion of existing policies are currently unavailable."
Salt Security is ranked 2nd in API Security with 1 review while Skybox Security Suite is ranked 18th in Vulnerability Management with 33 reviews. Salt Security is rated 0.0, while Skybox Security Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Salt Security writes "Provides visibility and control over all APIs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Skybox Security Suite writes "Efficient in vulnerability management, stable and easy to use ". Salt Security is most compared with Noname Security, Wallarm NG WAF, Traceable AI, Orca Security and 42Crunch API Security Platform, whereas Skybox Security Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, Tufin Orchestration Suite, FireMon Security Manager, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Rapid7 InsightVM.
We monitor all API Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
