We performed a comparison between Alluvio AppResponse and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"It provides us with complete visibility of every packet."
"The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance."
"Ability to see end to end user, application, server, and network response time and throughput data."
"AppResponse is a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility into applications at all levels, from Layer 1 to Layer 7. We can trace all those sections: physical, IP, transport, presentation, application, etc. It gives us the full picture."
"When it comes to the ability to scale up the product, this is suitable for small medium and large environments,"
"I have found the AppResponse, which is a packet capture solution, very good. It gives you the ability to drill down back in time. You've got all the packets there. You can troubleshoot it later, not immediately. It's very interesting."
"We really like the scalability capabilities."
"The most valuable feature is performance monitoring."
"Dashboard and the customization of the items and triggers are the most valuable features."
"The flexibility of this solution is amazing."
"I really enjoy network traffic triggers that allow us to check traffic threshold from ISP."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of virtual machines."
"We are able to do problem determination on runaway processes."
"Zabbix is very easy to implement."
"It's a very reliable platform and we've never had any issues regarding the scalability or the stability of Zabbix."
"We are able to monitor our virtual infrastructure, virtual machines, windows servers, databases, and the network using a simple network management protocol. We are able to pull almost all the metrics that we want, receive notifications, and have them integrate with telegrams for certain devices that are critical, such as UPSs."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"Need to bring back the NetFlow module for AppResponse."
"The AI features should be addressed in respect of the analysis and intelligence that must be supported and delivered in the tool to predigest the large amounts of data."
"If Alluvio AppResponse reduces its cost, it will be more beneficial for customers to monitor their application and network performance."
"They need to better integrate with products and solutions from different vendors."
"The pricing is on the higher side of things. If they could lower it, that would be ideal."
"Technical support needs to be more responsive."
"Integration between NPM and APM solutions would improve efficiency. There is no agent on the server site related to AppResponse."
"Alluvio AppResponse should improve its ability to expand across multiple operating systems."
"Zabbix technical support is sold separately."
"Having a more customizable interface and dashboard would be an improvement."
"The solution needs to add features for finding loopholes or problems and their root causes."
"The product delivers false positives during reporting because of flapping. Other reasonably priced alternatives may have better performance."
"I think the reporting part of Zabbix can be improved in terms of more user-friendly graphics to display the collected data. Many simple users who don't know how to use Zabbix properly might get confused by the reporting, although at the same time it is very versatile for my company."
"I am having difficulties connecting it to Grafana, as well as some of the other plugins like Kibana."
"Look and feel."
"There's a small module of APM, however, it is not an enhanced version. People usually ask for a full-fledged APM solution."
Alluvio AppResponse is ranked 37th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 15 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 10th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 98 reviews. Alluvio AppResponse is rated 8.8, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Alluvio AppResponse writes "It's a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility at all levels". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Alluvio AppResponse is most compared with ThousandEyes, NETSCOUT nGeniusONE, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Cisco Secure Network Analytics, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios XI and Nagios Core. See our Alluvio AppResponse vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
