We performed a comparison between Fortra Tripwire IP360 and Rapid7 InsightVM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."We could manage our entire IP range with the solution."
"It's become the pinnacle point for anything that enters the network or anything that's passing through to production to first be affected by IP360, hardened, and up to standard. For our integrity management, one was deployed in the bank about two years ago and that's still going to expand the usage and the product itself. That will go hand in hand with training and expanding the product as for where it's deployed."
"Tripwire IP360 is a very stable solution."
"It is good and fits well with pretty much all of our use case needs."
"You can bring in and get online to do reports fairly quickly,"
"It is stable and scalable."
"The main functionality of identifying item endpoints that weren't properly patched or had vulnerabilities is the solution's most valuable feature."
"The most valuable features of Rapid7 InsightVM are the accurate level of scanning and the workflows are good."
"We are very satisfied with the reports, as they provide us with the information that is required for our management."
"InsightVM's best features are the vulnerability database and remediation steps."
"I liked the dashboard on it. I could customize my dashboard with different widgets and different heat maps."
"We need to dedicate time and resources to keep it running."
"The reporting functions can use improvement. There is room for growth because reporting functions differ a lot depending on what you're going to output. It depends on whether it's for technical or senior management and how it's interpreted. There could be growth within the reporting functionality side."
"I am not very impressed by the technical support."
"Reporting could be expanded."
"The team needs to improve the speed and focus on the new bandwidth feed. Sometimes, it takes a while to scan, especially with new updates."
"InsightVM could be improved by providing passive scanning as an option."
"The integration with other solutions like JIRA could be better. Perhaps there could be some additional updates in the next phase that could integrate with it, so then you can proceed with the VT much easier."
"In order to be able to properly test the solution and make a decision, I would like to receive the test license code instantly and eliminate the wait time."
"The reporting is very bad when you compare it with other vulnerability assessment tools."
"It is still not a fully cloud-based solution. It will be helpful for customers if it is a complete cloud solution. It is a hybrid solution at the moment."
"There needs to be much clearer instructions surrounding scanning."
Fortra Tripwire IP360 is ranked 35th in Vulnerability Management with 6 reviews while Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 54 reviews. Fortra Tripwire IP360 is rated 7.0, while Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortra Tripwire IP360 writes "The solution helps users to manage their entire IP range, but it's unreliable and very expensive to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". Fortra Tripwire IP360 is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center and Trend Micro Deep Security, whereas Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Rapid7 InsightIDR.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.