We performed a comparison between QlikView and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Tableau, Oracle and others in Reporting."It is a stable product."
"You can switch views easily."
"The most useful feature of QlikView for me is the QVD concept."
"On the positive side, QlikView's scripting is a great asset as it functions as an ETL."
"The scalability is there."
"We use QlikView for its cost-effectiveness and ease of integration with databases."
"Easy to analyze data by click-through."
"One of the good thing is that you can integrate different data source technologies. So you can model your environment without having any of our views running."
"It's very flexible. If you look from the cloud implementation it is there. Reports are made quickly. Unlike other tools, it caters to all kinds of technical information on the front very easily. There's no need to put in any technical information. You can pull on the reports very easily, take action, and notify stakeholders."
"One key advantage of Splunk over competitors like IBM QRadar is its superior device integration capabilities."
"From the class that I took this week, being able to create notable events from whatever you find in the data set is pretty useful."
"it can explain to management about what kind of traffic is visiting the network. It can also explain other traffic coming in and out, along with protecting against malware."
"Being able to track impossible travel logins and things of that nature is valuable. We can track user logins from various IPs, various countries, and at various times to see if everything adds up."
"The SIEM is the most valuable feature of the product."
"This solution helps us increase our productivity."
"The feature that we use the most is the correlation search engine within ES."
"Though the initial setup phase is simple, when it comes to the integration with the custom systems, the configuration and the compatibility sometimes take some more time."
"The tool is expensive in Turkey."
"Enhancing user-friendliness would be highly beneficial."
"QlikView's UI could be more user-friendly."
"If a user wanted to see something not included in the application the new object had to be created by a power user or developer because Qlik view's scripting has somewhat of a learning curve."
"They could improve the speed."
"I really wish the application was easier to use in the development phase."
"It needs work with visualization."
"It needs integration with a configuration management solution."
"The only improvement I am expecting is the cost of the licensing. Clients are going to other solutions just because of the cost."
"Splunk does not build apps. They only go back and validate the apps that somebody has already built. They should have remote consulting support. They have a wonderful solution. They have 24/7 security. Nobody needs to depend on any third party and will therefore just buy Splunk on the cloud."
"It would be nice if Splunk reduced the cost of training. Their training sessions are way too costly."
"Adding custom visualization in Splunk has been improved over the years but can still be made better by integrating more and more JavaScript visualization sources."
"We will receive alerts only for the administrators and deployment servers, but not for all servers."
"It's costly."
"Could be more user friendly."
QlikView is ranked 5th in Reporting with 158 reviews while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 2nd in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 228 reviews. QlikView is rated 8.2, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of QlikView writes "Useful for data visualization and business intelligence". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". QlikView is most compared with Tableau, Microsoft Power BI, Amazon QuickSight, SQL Server and Alteryx, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel and Elastic Security.
We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
