PractiTest vs TestRail comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
PractiTest Logo
531 views|403 comparisons
IDERA Logo
3,701 views|1,690 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between PractiTest and TestRail based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Test Management Tools Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

More PractiTest Pros →

"You don't need to follow complex procedures to create a test run, test case, etc.""The API to support integration of the homemade automated testing tool.""Most valuable features are the ease of organizing test cases and a great API for sending results from automated test run results into the database.""Integration with Confluence and JIRA.""The product’s most valuable feature is the UI. The structure of test cases is easy to understand.""I use the product to create test cases and share them with my team and manager.""The solution is very stable. We've never had any issues with it.""I use the solution for test management."

More TestRail Pros →

Cons
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

More PractiTest Cons →

"It's not easy to create a custom report. It's not straightforward. A good improvement would be if there was a way to report and create a custom report without using a plugin or scripting language.""With TestRail, the APIs are there, but they may not be able to easily integrate with the Jenkins.""I do see room for lots of improvement in it. In terms of usability, duplication with test cases and constant creation of projects isn't easy. There is also too much API integration into automation tools, which is not there in ALM with UFT. Instead of setting it up as a project and using it, we set it up as a system for usability. It also lacks in the traceability aspect. For traceability, you need to use the JIRA plugin and drag traceability on JIRA, but the functionality is still quite limited. The biggest gap is mainframe testing. It would be good if I could start with mainframe testing. Manual granting of access is another issue. There is no API that I could use with another system where it is automated. There is an API for loading somebody to a project but not for adding to the application.""The reports should be more user-friendly.""The platform needs improvement regarding performance and creating links.""Reporting could be more flexible regarding repeating reports.""Their customer support could be improved. Sometimes we struggle with that. It could be faster. Whenever we raise any query, they get back to you but the turnaround time is very slow.""TestRail by Gurock could improve by adding a defect management module tool. It would add a lot of value if I want to install it and I don't have Jira or an isolating team. For example, if I am providing a service it's separated from the development team, it then would be better to have defect management included with the test management. However, as it is now I need to be integrated with Jira or another defect management tool to complete the testing process."

More TestRail Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."
  • More PractiTest Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Use TestRail Cloud (online TR hosted server) and don't worry about maintenance or scalability. It saves a lot of cash and time."
  • "My advice to others is to shop around for the best deal. Some options out there are free in cyberspace."
  • "Pricing for small teams seems correct with respect to competitors."
  • "Negotiate the best deal you can."
  • "Its price is definitely not more. If they introduce automation, they can charge more."
  • "The price of the solution is based on how many users you have per year. When you grow, it is segmented, For example, 10 to 25, you have a price, and more than 50, or 100, you need to take the enterprise license. I don't think we will reach this point."
  • "I give the price a five out of ten."
  • "The product is not much expensive."
  • More TestRail Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:I use the solution for test management.
    Top Answer:The product has a reasonable price in terms of the features.
    Ranking
    14th
    Views
    531
    Comparisons
    403
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    3rd
    Views
    3,701
    Comparisons
    1,690
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    309
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Zephyr Enterprise logo
    Compared 18% of the time.
    TFS logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Tricentis qTest logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Sealights logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Also Known As
    TestRail by Gurock
    Learn More
    Overview

    Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

    Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing. 
    • Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
    • Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
    • Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
    • Release your products with confidence and control.


    TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

    Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!

    Sample Customers
    Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman
    Apple, Microsoft, Boeing, Intel, NASA, Amazon, HP, Samsung
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Healthcare Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company50%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm13%
    University13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise57%
    Large Enterprise14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business61%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise22%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise56%
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Management Tools
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    PractiTest is ranked 14th in Test Management Tools while TestRail is ranked 3rd in Test Management Tools with 21 reviews. PractiTest is rated 8.8, while TestRail is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestRail writes "A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities". PractiTest is most compared with Jira, Zephyr Enterprise and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas TestRail is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, TFS, Tricentis qTest, Sealights and OpenText ALM / Quality Center.

    See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.