We performed a comparison between PractiTest and TestRail based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools."The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."
"You don't need to follow complex procedures to create a test run, test case, etc."
"The API to support integration of the homemade automated testing tool."
"Most valuable features are the ease of organizing test cases and a great API for sending results from automated test run results into the database."
"Integration with Confluence and JIRA."
"The product’s most valuable feature is the UI. The structure of test cases is easy to understand."
"I use the product to create test cases and share them with my team and manager."
"The solution is very stable. We've never had any issues with it."
"I use the solution for test management."
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."
"It's not easy to create a custom report. It's not straightforward. A good improvement would be if there was a way to report and create a custom report without using a plugin or scripting language."
"With TestRail, the APIs are there, but they may not be able to easily integrate with the Jenkins."
"I do see room for lots of improvement in it. In terms of usability, duplication with test cases and constant creation of projects isn't easy. There is also too much API integration into automation tools, which is not there in ALM with UFT. Instead of setting it up as a project and using it, we set it up as a system for usability. It also lacks in the traceability aspect. For traceability, you need to use the JIRA plugin and drag traceability on JIRA, but the functionality is still quite limited. The biggest gap is mainframe testing. It would be good if I could start with mainframe testing. Manual granting of access is another issue. There is no API that I could use with another system where it is automated. There is an API for loading somebody to a project but not for adding to the application."
"The reports should be more user-friendly."
"The platform needs improvement regarding performance and creating links."
"Reporting could be more flexible regarding repeating reports."
"Their customer support could be improved. Sometimes we struggle with that. It could be faster. Whenever we raise any query, they get back to you but the turnaround time is very slow."
"TestRail by Gurock could improve by adding a defect management module tool. It would add a lot of value if I want to install it and I don't have Jira or an isolating team. For example, if I am providing a service it's separated from the development team, it then would be better to have defect management included with the test management. However, as it is now I need to be integrated with Jira or another defect management tool to complete the testing process."
Earn 20 points
PractiTest is ranked 14th in Test Management Tools while TestRail is ranked 3rd in Test Management Tools with 21 reviews. PractiTest is rated 8.8, while TestRail is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestRail writes "A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities". PractiTest is most compared with Jira, Zephyr Enterprise and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas TestRail is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, TFS, Tricentis qTest, Sealights and OpenText ALM / Quality Center.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.