Picus Security vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Picus Security and Tenable One Exposure Management Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS).
To learn more, read our detailed Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration capabilities with the other security tools.""It's very useful software because the customer mostly configures their IPS and manages their firewalls, WAF, and the DBS according to the latest update, latest news, or according to the situation.""One of the most valuable features would be the detection capability, specifically the ability to detect alarms and logs collected from SIEM tools.""You have the liberty of physically executing a specific set of rules in your environment."

More Picus Security Pros →

"The product gives us a lot of insight.""The solution is very easy to set up."

More Tenable One Exposure Management Platform Pros →

Cons
"The amount of integrations that the product can handle is an area of concern, making it one of the aspects where improvements are required.""According to the attack vectors, you cannot specify which product is failing or which product is working well because there's no agent.""Let's say if a customer's environment has 10 security devices and they need to know that there is an attack that has bypassed their devices, they cannot go and inspect every device and every rule in their security devices.""The reporting and data analysis could be improved. Specifically, the analysis of the results."

More Picus Security Cons →

"It would be nice if the product provided an agent for enforcing policies.""The product has limited reporting capabilities and it isn't great at allowing for customization in reports."

More Tenable One Exposure Management Platform Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "They have certain price ranges for their products, depending upon the use cases, and the number of applications the customer wants to try."
  • "There is a yearly license according to the number of vectors. The pricing is moderate."
  • More Picus Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration capabilities with the other security tools.
    Top Answer:Pricing can be subjective, as it depends on the value the software provides to each customer. However, the pricing is in line with competitors in the market, so maybe around seven out of ten, where… more »
    Top Answer:The amount of integrations that the product can handle is an area of concern, making it one of the aspects where improvements are required.
    Top Answer:The product gives us a lot of insight.
    Top Answer:Access management must be improved. The access manager, security tool, and access control need very big improvements. It would be nice if the product provided an agent for enforcing policies. For now… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,714
    Comparisons
    1,652
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    620
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    385
    Comparisons
    273
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    357
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tenable.ep
    Learn More
    Overview

    Independent from any vendor or technology, the unparalleled Picus Platform is designed to continuously measure the effectiveness of security defenses by using emerging threat samples in production environments. Created by a team that’s been working together more than 10 years already and has proven their expertise in enterprise cybersecurity, Picus is trusted by many large multinational corporations and government agencies.

    You can now translate technical asset, vulnerability and threat data into clear business insights and actionable intelligence for security executives. Combine broad exposure coverage spanning IT assets, cloud resources, containers, web apps and identity platforms, with threat intelligence and data science from Tenable Research. Focus efforts to prevent likely attacks and accurately communicate cyber risk to support optimal business performance.

    Tenable One is an exposure management platform that combines risk-based vulnerability management, web application security, cloud security and identity security.
    Sample Customers
    Akbank, Exclusive Networks, Garanti, ING Bank, QNB Finansbank, Turkcell, Vodafone, Yapı Kredi
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    University7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise73%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Picus Security is ranked 3rd in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 4 reviews while Tenable One Exposure Management Platform is ranked 8th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews. Picus Security is rated 9.0, while Tenable One Exposure Management Platform is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Picus Security writes "Breach and attack simulation software that provides network, endpoint, and email vectors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable One Exposure Management Platform writes "A highly scalable and reasonably priced solution that provides insight into user activities". Picus Security is most compared with Pentera, Cymulate, SafeBreach, AttackIQ and Verodin, whereas Tenable One Exposure Management Platform is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Pentera and AttackIQ.

    See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

    We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.