We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and Trend Micro Deep Discovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms."The feature that I like best is the dashboard."
"The most valuable feature is alerting."
"The logs play a crucial role as they contribute to blocking unwanted Internet traffic."
"I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security."
"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."
"The most valuable feature of Trend Micro Deep Discovery is its complete end-to-end visibility of threats."
"The product is very easy to install."
"It is a very good solution. It is very light, and it is quite quick to figure out the problem in your network."
"The solution has extension-based features that help it to analyze the environment. The environment can have different platforms like Windows, Linux, and Mac. The tool will give a report which can confirm the analysis of the issues. You can also get clear information on threats or suspicious files."
"As a security product, managing threats is crucial for my clients."
"The performance and stability are great."
"The HTML file sandboxing is very good."
"Initial setup is easy. It can be done by yourself."
"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."
"It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution."
"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring."
"I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate."
"It is a completely cloud-based product at present."
"The stability of the solution could be improved. It should be 100% stable, but it's not there right now."
"Some of the end users may not be technically proficient, so they occasionally face problems due to a lack of knowledge."
"The solution needs improvement in terms of pricing."
"The solution needs to be able to integrate better with third-party infrastructure."
"I would like to see them create a rule where It could integrate with the network and start mitigating with auto-detection."
"The product's scalability feature needs to be improved, as it is an area in the product with certain shortcomings."
"This solution could be improved with faster technical support and cheaper licensing prices."
"Scalability becomes an issue when managing a higher number of customers."
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 9th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 5 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Discovery is ranked 8th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 22 reviews. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 7.8, while Trend Micro Deep Discovery is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Impressive performance and monitoring capabilities but lacks in documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Discovery writes "Good threat detection capabilities and offers flexibility for hosting options". Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), Anomali ThreatStream, VirusTotal, LogRhythm SIEM and Cisco Threat Grid, whereas Trend Micro Deep Discovery is most compared with Darktrace, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, Arista NDR, Vectra AI and Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
