We performed a comparison between Oracle GoldenGate and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The live application feature is most valuable. The solution is stable. I rate it a seven out of ten."
"Ease of installation, maintenance and powerful outputs and supporting Big Data and Cloud environment as well as OGGCS (Oracle Golden Gate Cloud Service)."
"You can put data together from a few databases into one database or the other way, from one database into several. It transforms data in real-time."
"The solution's existing SaaS platform for data integration gives us an edge."
"The CDC feature is interesting."
"The product's microservice architecture is scalable."
"Data migration is the most valuable feature of Oracle GoldenGate."
"The solution is useful for data transformation."
"Best feature is Insight for monitoring, and as a debugging tool. It has saved us a lot of time during crisis situations."
"The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging."
"It's very flexible and a good platform to use."
"The product supports various types of digital documents, including XMLs and EDI."
"All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value."
"The synchronous and asynchronous messaging system the solution provides is very good."
"It is a bundled product stack for A2A and B2B usage. It is one of the best products which I have used during my integration career."
"We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting."
"A clean and user-friendly graphical interface based on common design principles would be beneficial."
"The GoldenGate license is very costly."
"It would be great if Oracle added some enhanced features or more functionalities to Oracle GoldenGate."
"Microservices Architecture is not user-friendly."
"In the future, I would appreciate a more user-friendly monitoring interface for easier management and troubleshooting."
"I find the user interface to be difficult for non-technical people."
"The solution costs a lot."
"The product lacks some features and it's expensive."
"In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick."
"Upgrades are complex. They typically take about five months from start to finish. There are many packages that plug into webMethods Integration Server, which is the central point for a vast majority of the transactions at my organization. Anytime we are upgrading that, there are complexities within each component that we must understand. That makes any upgrade very cumbersome and complicated. That has been my experience at this company. Because there are many different business units that we are touching, there are so many different components that we are touching. The amount of READMEs that you have to go through takes some time."
"Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems."
"This is a great solution and the vendor could improve the marketing of the solution to be able to reach more clients."
"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."
"On the monitoring side of things, the UI for monitoring could be improved. It's a bit cumbersome to work with."
"For code version control, you need to use some external software."
"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 47 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) with 60 reviews. Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with webMethods.io Integration, IBM Integration Bus, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Oracle Service Bus. See our Oracle GoldenGate vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.