Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs SUSE NeuVector comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Jul 5, 2023

We performed a comparison between Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and SUSE NeuVector based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Features: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is lauded for its visibility and management capabilities. Users say they value Prisma Cloud's compliance monitoring, vulnerability scanning, and security controls. SUSE NeuVector earns high marks for its informative user interface and integration with CI/CD pipelines. Prisma Cloud needs to be more customizable and improve integration with ticketing solutions. Zero-day threat protection and reporting were also mentioned as weak points by some users. SUSE NeuVector could improve support for IaaS and VM scanning, hybrid environment integration, and visibility into the DevSecOps pipeline.
  • Service and Support: Some Prisma Cloud users say Palo Alto support is prompt and top-notch, but dissatisfied customers complain about sluggish response and resolution times. SUSE NeuVector customers are generally content with the technical support, considering it as valuable and well-informed. A few individuals find the support process hard to navigate.
  • Ease of Deployment: Prisma Cloud's setup is uncomplicated, aided by engineer support and useful documentation. Some SUSE NeuVector users said the initial setup was complicated, but others thought it was manageable. Users said integrating pipelines can be challenging and may require custom scripts.
  • Pricing: Prisma Cloud is considered an expensive solution, but users say it's worth the price because of its advantages. Some SUSE NeuVector users find it affordable. Others say the price has room for improvement.
  • ROI: Prisma Cloud improves risk visibility and enables security engineers to identify issues quicker. By minimizing cyberattack vulnerabilities, Prisma Cloud raises an organization's security posture. SUSE NeuVector produces the highest ROI in high-risk sectors, but it may offer lesser returns to industries like retail. 

Comparison Results: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is preferred over SUSE NeuVector. Users appreciate Prisma Cloud's comprehensive visibility and management capabilities. The solution stands out for its ability to provide security across multi- and hybrid-cloud environments, making it a popular option for cloud security and compliance management.

To learn more, read our detailed Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. SUSE NeuVector Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It has helped us understand the dynamic topology of our containers, and manage security through the application of policies that our pipelines apply straight from Git.""The product is quite good for providing multi-clouds or cross-cloud security from a single-pane -of-glass.""I would say Twistlock is a fairly sophisticated tool.""Integration is very easy. And because it supports security that spans multi- and hybrid-cloud environments, it's very easy to use.""The support is excellent.""Configuration monitoring and alerting is the most valuable feature; it happens at the cloud's speed, allowing our development team to respond quickly. If a configuration goes against our security best practices, we're alerted promptly and can act to resolve the issue. As cloud security staff, we're not staring at the cloud all the time, and we want to let the developers do their jobs so that our company is protected and work is proceeding within our security controls.""One of the main reasons we like Prisma Cloud so much is that they also provide an API. You can't expect to give someone an account on Prisma Cloud, or on any tool for that matter, and say, "Go find your things and fix them." It doesn't work like that... We pull down the information from the API that Prisma Cloud provides, which is multi-cloud, multi-account—hundreds and hundreds of different types of alerts graded by severity—and then we can clearly identify that these alerts belong to these people, and they're the people who must remediate them.""CSPM is very useful because it gives us good policies and violation alerts."

More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Pros →

"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable.""The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security.""The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities.""The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward.""When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly.""The UI has a lot of features.""The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."

More SUSE NeuVector Pros →

Cons
"The alignment of Twistlock Defender agents with image repositories needs improvement. These deployed agents have no way of differentiating between on-premise and cloud-based image repositories. If I deploy a Defender agent to secure an on-premise Kubernetes cluster, that agent also tries to scan my ECR image repositories on AWS. So, we have limited options for aligning those Defenders with the repositories that we want them to scan. It is scanning everything rather than giving us the ability to be real granular in choosing which agents can scan which repositories.""The integration of the Compute function into the cloud monitoring function—because those are two different tools that are being combined together—could use some more work. It still feels a little bit disjointed.""They are missing some compatibility details in their documentation.""We'd like to have more native integration with clouds and additional security checks in the future.""In terms of securing cloud-native development at build time, a lot of improvement is needed. Currently, it's more a runtime solution than a build-time solution. For runtime, I would rate it at seven out of 10, but for build-time there is a lot of work to be done.""The area for improvement is less about the product and more about the upsell. If we've already agreed that we'd like your product x, y, or z, don't try to add fries to my burger. I don't need it.""Getting new guys trained on using the solution requires some thought. If someone is already trained on Palo Alto then he's able to adapt quickly. But, if someone is coming from another platform such as Fortinet, or maybe he's from the system side, that is where we need some help. We need to find out if there is an online track or training that they can go to.""When there are updates, whether daily, weekly, or monthly, it needs configuration or permission adjustments. There is no automation for that, which is too bad."

More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Cons →

"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment.""The image-scanning features need improvement.""I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline.""SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning.""SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful.""We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines.""The documentation needs to improve a bit."

More SUSE NeuVector Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The purchasing process was easy and quick. It is a very economical solution."
  • "Our licensing fees are $18,000 USD per year."
  • "One thing we're very pleased about is how the licensing model for Prisma is based on work resources. You buy a certain amount of work resources and then, as they enable new capabilities within Prisma, it just takes those work resource units and applies them to new features. This enables us to test and use the new features without having to go back and ask for and procure a whole new product, which could require going through weeks, and maybe months, of a procurement process."
  • "The pricing and the licensing are both very fair... The biggest advice I would give in terms of costs would be to try to understand what the growth is going to look like. That's really been our biggest struggle, that we don't have an idea of what our future growth is going to be on the platform. We go from X number of licenses to Y number of licenses without a plan on how we're going to get from A to B, and a lot of that comes as a bit of a surprise. It can make budgeting a real challenge for it."
  • "From my exposure so far, they have been really flexible on whatever your current state is, with a view to what the future state might be. There's no hard sell. They "get" the journey that you're on, and they're trying to help you embrace cloud security, governance, and compliance as you go."
  • "If a competitor came along and said, "We'll give you half the price," that doesn't necessarily mean that's the right answer, at all. We wouldn't necessarily entertain it that way. Does it do what we need it to do? Does it work with the things that we want it to work with? That is the important part for us. Pricing wasn't the big consideration it might be in some organizations. We spend millions on public cloud. In that context, it would not make sense to worry about the small price differences that you get between the products."
  • "The pricing and licensing are expensive compared to the other offerings that we considered."
  • "I don't know a better way to do it, but their licensing is a little confusing. That's due to the breadth of different types of technologies they are trying to cover. The way you license depends on where you're securing. When they were Twistlock it was a simple licensing scheme and you could tell what you were doing. Now that they've changed that scheme with Palo Alto, it is quite confusing. It's very difficult to predict what your costs are going to be as you try to expand coverage."
  • More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Licensing fees are paid yearly."
  • "The solution's pricing could be better. The cost of a subscription is calculated on the basis of work."
  • "The price of SUSE NeuVector is low. There is an additional cost for support."
  • "SUSE NeuVector is an open-source solution."
  • More SUSE NeuVector Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Prisma Cloud helps support DevSecOps methodologies, making those responsibilities easier to manage.
    Top Answer:We like Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, since it offers us incredible visibility into our entire cloud system. We are able to easily see where our container vulnerabilities lie and and where cloud… more »
    Top Answer:Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valuable feature and their speed of integration is very good. The initial setup was… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security.
    Top Answer:SUSE NeuVector is an open-source solution. You have to pay for the support.
    Top Answer:SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning.
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 59 in Container Security
    Views
    26,040
    Comparisons
    14,438
    Reviews
    54
    Average Words per Review
    1,119
    Rating
    8.4
    17th
    out of 59 in Container Security
    Views
    3,109
    Comparisons
    2,189
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    399
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud, Prisma Public Cloud, RedLock Cloud 360, RedLock, Twistlock, Aporeto
    NeuVector
    Learn More
    Overview

    Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is a cloud security solution used for cloud security posture management, cloud workload protection, container security, and code security. It provides visibility, monitoring, and alerting for security issues in multi-cloud environments. 

    The solution is user-friendly, easy to set up, and integrates with SIEM for generating alerts and reports. Its most valuable features include security features, monitoring capabilities, reporting, compliance monitoring, vulnerability dashboard, data security features, and multi-cloud capabilities. Prisma Cloud has helped organizations by providing comprehensive protection, automating workflows, simplifying troubleshooting, and improving collaboration between SecOps and DevOps.

    Prisma Cloud Features

    Prisma Cloud offers comprehensive security coverage in all areas of the cloud development lifecycle:

    • Code security: Protect configurations, scan code before it enters production, and integrate with other tools.

    • Security posture management: Monitor posture, identify and remove threats, and provide compliance across public clouds.

    • Workload protection: Secure hosts and containers across the application lifecycle.

    • Network security: Gain network visibility and enforce micro segmentation.

    • Identity security: Enforce permissions and secure identities across clouds.

    Benefits of Prisma Cloud

    • Unified management: All users use the same dashboards built via shared onboarding, allowing cloud security to be addressed from a single agent framework.

    • High-speed onboarding: Multiple cloud accounts and users are onboarded within seconds, rapidly activating integrated security capabilities.

    • Multiple integration options: Prisma Cloud can integrate with widely used IDE, SCM, and CI/CD workflows early in development, enabling users to identify and fix vulnerabilities and compliance issues before they enter production. Prisma Cloud supports all major workflows, automation frameworks, and third-party tools.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Prisma Cloud stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its integration capabilities, as well as its visibility, which makes it very easy for users to get a full picture of the cloud environment.

    Alex J., an information security manager at Cobalt.io, writes, “Prisma Cloud has enabled us to take a very strong preventive approach to cloud security. One of the hardest things with cloud is getting visibility into workloads. With Prisma Cloud, you can go in and get that visibility, then set up policies to alert on risky behavior, e.g., if there are security groups or firewall ports open up. So, it is very helpful in preventing configuration errors in the cloud by having visibility. If there are issues, then you can find them and fix them.”

    Luke L., a cloud security specialist for a financial services firm, writes, “You can also integrate with Amazon Managed Services. You can also get a snapshot in time, whether that's over a 24-hour period, seven days, or a month, to determine what the estate might look like at a certain point in time and generate reports from that for vulnerability management forums.”

    SUSE NeuVector is a full lifecycle container security solution that helps your organization secure its container infrastructures, manage Kubernetes security risks, and block threats. The NeuVector continuous container security and compliance platform simplifies data protection from pipeline to production, enforces compliance, and provides complete visibility and automated controls for protection against known and unknown threats. In addition, NeuVector is the only Kubernetes-native container security solution that offers a comprehensive risk profile of known vulnerabilities and also delivers immediate protection from all vulnerabilities.

    SUSE NeuVector Features

    SUSE NueVector has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Container incident detection and prevention
    • Network security
    • Runtime security
    • Supply chain security
    • Container firewall
    • Host and platform security
    • Cloud-native automation and integration
    • Resource monitoring
    • Visualization and reporting
    • High availability
    • Security
    • Vulnerability management
    • Compliance and auditing
    • Alerting
    • Logging and Response

    SUSE NeuVector Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing NeuVector. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Deep packet inspection (DPI): NeuVector applies DPI to identify attacks, detect sensitive data, or verify application access to further reduce the attack surface. Only network layer analysis enables security to detect and verify the allowed protocols, helping security teams enforce business policy.
    • Real-time protection: NeuVector provides inspection, segmentation, and protection of all traffic into and out of a container. This includes container to container traffic, and ingress from external sources to containers, as well as egress from containers to external applications and the internet. The solution aims to protect your applications from internal application level attacks such as DDoS and DNS.
    • Capture packets for debugging and threat investigation: WIth NeuVector, you can view summary connection data and drill down into actual packet details for each container, as they scale up and down. When a threat is detected, NeuVector is able to automatically capture and display the packet info, making it easy for you to investigate.
    • Automated security policies: The NeuVector solution allows you to automate the creation of security policies to protect application workloads in production. The solution also enables you to automate and maintain run-time security policies using Kubernetes custom resource definitions (CRDs), and gives you the option to declare an application security policy at any stage in the pipeline.
    • Compliance: NeuVector offers detection capabilities and security policy enforcement that prevent PHI and PII exposure, exceed requirements, and simplify reporting for PCI-DSS, GDPR, HIPAA, and more. The solution helps you track critical vulnerabilities and compliance violations so you can quickly identify any that require immediate patching or followup alerts. It also makes it possible for you to manage vulnerability and compliance scan results, with no required integration to external workflow tools.

    Reviews from Real Users

    A Platform Solution Architect at a tech services company says, “The solution is feature-rich, easy to set up, and has good support.”

    Sample Customers
    Amgen, Genpact, Western Asset, Zipongo, Proofpoint, NerdWallet, Axfood, 21st Century Fox, Veeva Systems, Reinsurance Group of America
    Figo, Clear Review, Arvato Bertelsmann, Experian, Chime
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company33%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Healthcare Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Educational Organization13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise29%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. SUSE NeuVector
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. SUSE NeuVector and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 1st in Container Security with 81 reviews while SUSE NeuVector is ranked 17th in Container Security with 7 reviews. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.4, while SUSE NeuVector is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks writes "The dashboard is very user-friendly and can be used to generate custom RQL based on user requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SUSE NeuVector writes "Good value for money; great for policy management". Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Aqua Cloud Security Platform and AWS Security Hub, whereas SUSE NeuVector is most compared with Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Sysdig Falco, Sysdig Secure and Snyk. See our Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. SUSE NeuVector report.

    See our list of best Container Security vendors and best CWPP (Cloud Workload Protection Platforms) vendors.

    We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.