N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs TeamViewer Remote Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management and TeamViewer Remote Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The network device is a good feature. In a place where you need to monitor your firewall switches, you can add an RMM tool and monitor it on the same screen on the same setup for the same client. Network devices are very good.""The solution provides an administration panel where we can see what is happening on our client's stations, such as events, alerts, and all the software installed.""The most valuable aspect of N-able Remote Monitoring & Management is it provides an all-in solution for the different solutions.""The details and the reports they provide are what I like, especially the details for almost the whole computer and the OS type.""The most helpful feature is script deployment because we can create whatever we want to deploy on our devices. This works in a cloud environment, where we previously relied on Active Directory. Since the start of the COVID outbreak, all the staff members began working from home, and most of the people there did not use the VPN to transfer the policies.""The reporting for this solution has been most valuable.""I like being able to get a picture of what's happening on a computer. I can just click on it, and I can see the CPU usage and the memory usage and what services and programs are currently running. I can connect remotely to a computer. All these are very useful.""The solution is user-friendly."

More N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management Pros →

"There are some great features.""The stability seems to be pretty good so far.""The remote access is most valuable.""The initial setup of TeamViewer Remote Management is very simple.""It's stable and reliable.""The product helps us efficiently fix technical issues and maintain system downtime.""Transferring files and viewing data work well with TeamViewer Remote Management.""The product is secure."

More TeamViewer Remote Management Pros →

Cons
"The solutions could improve by adding more features.""The SentinelOne integration is not great.""The reporting could be more customizable. RMM pulls a vast amount of data, but you need to filter through it to get a decent executive report each month. I'm pulling reports all day through the XML file and such to get the information our executive needs. They don't want a 34-megabyte Excel spreadsheet, but the overview only provides limited information, like a basic breakdown.""What could be improved in N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is the reporting, in particular, the reporting interface and the report generation method. Currently, I don't find it easy to run reports on the solution. Every time, if I want a report on a Windows vulnerability because a client requested that report, I find the process difficult. For example, out of one hundred PCs, I need to get a report on how many PCs have not been updated to a specific patch level. I need to give that report to the CTO or CEO of a particular client organization, and as running the report on N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management isn't easy, sometimes, that makes me doubt the validity of the generated report as well. It depends on each case because I do find some reports to be genuine and 100% correct, but most of the time, I have to ask for help from other engineers, and even collaborating with another engineer to run reports isn't that easy, so reporting needs improvement in N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management. Another room for improvement in the solution is patch management. The user-friendliness of the Take Control feature in N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management also needs improvement, particularly when it's used on multiple computers or displays. Switching between displays isn't as user-friendly on the technician side, so that could be improved by letting you see all displays or monitors all at once, or on a single display, rather than needing to switch from one display to another. As Take Control is on a Windows agent, or running on a client-end device, that feature of N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management could be improved as well. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is a mobile application, though I'm not familiar if that's already available. As an IT MSP, sometimes I have on-call jobs, and I don't always want to look at the mailbox to see if there's any alert triggered from the devices. If N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management has a mobile application that would allow my team to get push notifications whenever there's downtime or issues, then that would make the solution more reliable. I'd like to get an alert that would pop up from my mobile device, so it would be pretty easy to keep an eye on alerts, and I won't have to check my inbox every time.""The product looks a bit old-fashioned.""The alerts and reporting could be done a little more clearly. They are quite cryptic, and quite often, we seem to get a lot of reports just for a computer rebooting or going offline for a couple of minutes, which doesn't seem like it's that big of a deal. Reporting could be refined and improved, and they can make it easy to decipher the reports.""Kaseya is a similar product and they have easier scripts. If you want to deploy one software to 100 machines, we need to dig into it and then we need to create the script and work with the support team and then we can deploy that particular script. The pre-built scripted is the one thing that I would definitely like to have improved.""The patch management of the solution could improve."

More N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management Cons →

"I would like to see better pricing, more customization, and increased automation.""The solution’s stability could be improved.""The solution is a bit expensive. It could be cheaper.""The price point would probably be an area of improvement with the number of competitors out there offering similar features. TeamViewer usually comes in a little high as compared to other solutions.""One feature to add would be a mobile remote feature.""AnyDesk is easier compared to TeamViewer Remote Management since there is no password. We use AnyDesk more.""When a user is engaged in a chat on a system with a remote user present, copying the chat content isn't easy.""One of the defects that I have noticed with TeamViewer Remote Management is that if I am on a certain version and the person to whom I am connected is not on the same version, then it does not connect at times until I update the solution."

More TeamViewer Remote Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's expensive and out of our budget."
  • "We use SolarWinds RMM on a pay-as-you-go monthly basis, so the cost can be highly variable because it depends on a few factors such as how many devices you need to support and what extra features you want to use. The more devices you have, the more you'll pay, and the same goes for extras."
  • "There is a license required for this solution."
  • "I haven't paid a whole lot of attention to that since I set it up. It has per-user licensing. If I remember it correctly, it worked out to about $10 a month per user. There were no additional costs. It was pretty straightforward and simple."
  • "Out clients pay monthly for the license of N-able Remote Monitoring & Management."
  • "As I'm not part of the procurement team and because I'm 100% technical, I'm not that familiar with the costs associated with N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management, but I can say that in my location, particularly here in Sri Lanka, it's more expensive than other RMM solutions. I'm working for an Australian IT MSP, and over there, the solution isn't as expensive, but where I'm located, it is, so this is the reason why sometimes, clients don't go with N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management. Licensing cost is also the reason why my organization is looking into Kaseya RMM. My current organization merged with another organization that's using both Kaseya RMM and Connectwise."
  • "The product is fairly priced."
  • "The solution is not very expensive."
  • More N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Its price is a little high as compared to other solutions."
  • "Our licenses for TeamViewer Remote Management are being managed directly by our procurement team. If we need more licenses they handle it."
  • "We are now using the free version, but probably next year we are going to follow up with the paid version."
  • "We pay for a yearly license."
  • "Addition services could be lower priced."
  • "It is a licensed product."
  • "My company uses the free version of TeamViewer Remote Management."
  • "We pay a yearly licensing fee."
  • More TeamViewer Remote Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We use the solution in our organization, and we also integrate it into one of our clients in the US. We used it for monitoring initially. We monitor all the computers' updates and specs. We also use… more »
    Top Answer:The details and the reports they provide are what I like, especially the details for almost the whole computer and the OS type.
    Top Answer:The fact that it's user-friendly and it has a chat option. These are my two favorite features.
    Top Answer:Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. This is a great tool for remote access and communication since it's very reliable.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,453
    Comparisons
    953
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    944
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    1,306
    Comparisons
    615
    Reviews
    22
    Average Words per Review
    376
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    N-able Remote Monitoring & Management, SolarWinds MSP Remote Monitoring & Management, MSP RMM, SolarWinds RMM, SolarWinds Remote Monitoring and Management
    Learn More
    N-able
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    RMM software designed for next-level protection

    Defend Windows and Apple devices with flexible, real-time remote monitoring and management, and a simple dashboard highlighting critical information during operational peaks.

    Patch Microsoft and more

    Keep devices compliant and secure with flexible patch management that easily allows MSPs to patch every aspect of the MSFT Environment and beyond.

    Enhance your TeamViewer experience and take your IT management to the next level. TeamViewer Remote Management provides you with an integrated RMM solutions that will allow you to gain a high degree of visibility into your IT infrastructure. Monitor business critical aspects of your IT, centralize important device information without relying on end-user input, detect and patch software vulnerabilities, and protect your devices against external threats and human error – Completely integrated in to your TeamViewer environment.

    Sample Customers
    NetSys Network Systems
    Carey Paul Honda
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Educational Organization6%
    REVIEWERS
    Construction Company11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Media Company11%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business85%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise40%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business58%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise27%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise47%
    Buyer's Guide
    N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs. TeamViewer Remote Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs. TeamViewer Remote Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is ranked 6th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 13 reviews while TeamViewer Remote Management is ranked 3rd in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 33 reviews. N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is rated 8.2, while TeamViewer Remote Management is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management writes "User-friendly and allows you to do different activities on a single interface, and gives you visibility into multiple devices, but its reporting interface and report generation could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer Remote Management writes "Highly stable and scalable solution". N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is most compared with N-able N-central, Zabbix, NinjaOne, ConnectWise RMM and Fortinet FortiSIEM, whereas TeamViewer Remote Management is most compared with Azure Bastion, NinjaOne, Datto Remote Monitoring and Management and Kaseya VSA. See our N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs. TeamViewer Remote Management report.

    See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.

    We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.