"In Microsoft PowerApps the most valuable features are the fully customizable design that we can control everything that we would like to control. For example, the integration between Microsoft and third-party services through pre-built connectors, and the functionality to create custom connectors."
"The solution is excellent at figuring how to build an application in three months. It makes it very quick and easy."
"The most valuable feature is the compatibility with other Microsoft components."
"The most valuable feature is the time-to-market because you can make apps pretty fast."
"When I am developing any user UI, it gives me complete flexibility. I can manage in any way I want."
"It uses a lot of AI, which is helpful, especially during the setup process."
"For our purposes, it is quite scalable."
"Of all of the solutions I evaluated, it was the easiest to use and deploy."
"Studio Creatio is a very good and complete solution. It is very stable, and for customers who need a good response time, in the public cloud, Creatio provides the possibility to have a private server for a high level of transactions and good response time. Their support is great. They are very good, and they know the solution very well. Their response time is also great."
"The low-code tools and business process management that Creatio provides are useful for our internal processes. It is also very easy to use."
"The most valuable features are performance, built-in variety of multiple task automation, and has international standards notations."
"It is a low-code platform, that is very intuitive."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its simplicity."
"Microsoft PowerApps can improve the number of bugs that are present. When you are using the different applications it is not accurate."
"PowerApps can't do a lot of things that users need now. For example, it can't handle signatures."
"Microsoft PowerApps can be more costly for small teams or organizations."
"In some cases, PowerApps would have some limitations in terms of the data, the number of transactions, and so on, but for a normal solution, it would be enough."
"We'd like to see more integration capabilities in the future."
"Microsoft is not cheap. The pricing could be lowered for their customers."
"The stability of this solution could be better."
"It is not enough user friendly. It also doesn't integrate very well with SQL Server."
"It does not have the ability to run one single large process."
"I can have several types of contacts, customers, employees, partners, and so on, and I would like to have a different view for each type of contact in the list view. Currently, there is no way to configure this. This is something I would like Creatio to improve. In this time of COVID, it is very important that all such solutions improve omnichannel communications and omnichannel marketing. Companies need to communicate with customers by using not just the phone number and email but also by using social networks. All companies today need artificial intelligence, machine learning, the internet of things, and social communication."
"They can improve the business rules for defining the type and quantity of the business load. They already seem to be working on this improvement. Integration with the social networks will be very appreciated by the companies. It will be very useful for communication between the company and customers, that is, B to C relationships. Most of the customers or users have smartphones, and they use a lot of social networks. Companies need to stay connected with the customers. They have enabled integration with WhatsApp and Telegram in recent releases, which has been very useful."
"Numerous options can make implementation confusing."
"The solution does not allow extensive customization of the UI. I would like to have much more control over the UI when I build a process. Currently on the UI where the fields are placed and the layout is set in place and you cannot change it. Your experience is going to be the same throughout whatever use case that you are building from customer to customer. You can not have much control over how it looks for each customer. This is an area where they can improve on."
Microsoft PowerApps is ranked 2nd in Rapid Application Development Software with 46 reviews while Studio Creatio is ranked 13th in Rapid Application Development Software with 5 reviews. Microsoft PowerApps is rated 7.8, while Studio Creatio is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft PowerApps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Studio Creatio writes "An easy-to-use BPM and low-code platform with proactive technical support". Microsoft PowerApps is most compared with Mendix, Oracle Application Express (APEX), ServiceNow, Microsoft Azure App Service and OutSystems, whereas Studio Creatio is most compared with Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service, Camunda Platform, Bizagi, Mendix and OutSystems. See our Microsoft PowerApps vs. Studio Creatio report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
