Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Nutanix Unified Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
14,358 views|11,729 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Nutanix Logo
620 views|227 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure File Storage and Nutanix Unified Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Nutanix Unified Storage Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We have not explored the desktop performance analysis of the file storage, but the user interface, API, and the response that we receive over the file storage are very good. We have a lot of customers that connect to the client-side, click the images, and upload them. The beauty of the solution is that we can mount the file storage into a critical server as well as an external drive. The speed that we receive with the images is pretty good.""The initial setup is straightforward and takes approximately twenty minutes.""It is a very scalable solution. I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten.""The functionality is easy.""The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure File Storage is the cloud file storage capability.""It is very easy to use SSTP and some traditional code to move the data into a database because we can easily use the permissions and we don't have any integration or conversion issues.""The initial setup is fairly easy.""The solution is easy to use."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pros →

"Unified Storage's centralized management features enable us to accomplish whatever we want in terms of operations and migrations.""I like Nutanix Prism Central. The primary benefit is that we can manage everything from the same page.""The solution is easy to use, share, and manage.""What I found most valuable in Nutanix Files Storage is its high availability and ability to scale out with many VMs.""The most valuable feature is the easy interface.""The solution is simple and robust.""The management interface is great and you have handy access to several details about your file shares.""Nutanix Unified Storage is easy to use. New employees are able to come up to speed fairly quickly with regard to the day-to-day administration processes."

More Nutanix Unified Storage Pros →

Cons
"I have used the file storage explorer in multiple systems, and it seems a bit cumbersome and not very efficient, particularly with authentication. It can be tricky to set it up.""The pricing and technical support could be better.""The way retention policies are applied could be more optimized.""It would be helpful if we could remove data that we don't frequently access to reduce the cost of the storage.""In our use cases, we see the weakness in mobile internet connectivity.""The product must provide better security functions.""It would be good if they added some features that make the solution easier to access for everyone.""Considering the enterprise licensing required for the solution, the cost of the solution is an area where the product needs improvement."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Cons →

"Unified Storage failed to fulfill our object storage requirements.""We have issues with software updates occasionally.""If they can add an integrated DLP feature, it would be great.""The interface could be improved.""One thing I'd appreciate is having a desktop application similar to what VMware offered.""We have some problems with Nutanix Unified Storage's support because they asked us to change our hardware.""The interface is not logical. It should be a little simpler.""The GUI is easy to use, but it's complex to do tasks from the command line. That is one way they could simplify things for the engineers. People tend to use a graphical interface more than the command line interface. If anything goes wrong, we need to do troubleshooting from the CLI. It would be nice if there were more ways to fix issues within the GUI."

More Nutanix Unified Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "For one terabyte of data, we are spending about 150 Euro every month."
  • "One of the major benefits for AWS is that they have a very large customer representative base where clients can be picked from, they offer large discounts and credit. We were not able to receive the same kind of offers from Microsoft Azure File Storage. We tried to approach Azure while hiring for our disaster recovery discussion, but we didn't receive anything from Azure."
  • "The price is comparable to other competitive solutions."
  • "There are fewer hidden costs involved compared to other solutions, and when our customer is already a Microsoft partner, they typically have access to more affordable fees."
  • "Microsoft Azure File Storage has a reasonable price."
  • "I give the pricing of the solution a seven out of ten."
  • "One needs to pay according to the storage they plan to use in the solution. The payments are to be made yearly. It is usually monthly, but we opted for yearly subscriptions in our company."
  • "Microsoft Azure File Storage is expensive."
  • More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of the license is expensive when comparing it to traditional storage."
  • "I find Nutanix Files Storage competitively priced, even its feature set. Its price is seven out of ten."
  • "If we compare the cost of Nutanix Objects Storage to other solutions such as VMware licenses, our current choice is Nutanix Objects Storage. This solution is more cost-effective. However, adding VMware to Nutanix would not be a cost-efficient decision, which is why we do not use it anymore."
  • "It is quite expensive otherwise as it comes with three-tier peer underlying hardware."
  • "For clients running Nutanix, the licensing cost for Files is a small add-on cost."
  • "With all of the Nutanix equipment, the licensing is expensive. We operate in the enterprise space, but we're a midsized company. At times, the price tag is a little bit shocking for a company with only 35 employees. We're not a Fortune 500 company, but we deal with Fortune 500 drug and energy companies. We have to play in that enterprise space if we're going to have enterprise customers. I'm very price-conscious, but I understand that if I want the best, I've got to pay the price."
  • "It's not the cheapest solution. It's in line with other solutions, but it offers features that the competitors don't have at any price point, especially with regard to analytics and ransomware prevention. No one else has any sort of object-based storage available. Nutanix Unified Storage is a lot more feature-rich. This is a situation where you get what you pay for."
  • "The product is pricey."
  • More Nutanix Unified Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This… more »
    Top Answer:Currently, the most valuable aspect of our Nutanix implementation is its file storage functionality.
    Top Answer:Unified Storage is reasonably priced compared to other platforms. The license is neither costly nor cheap, but it's reasonable.
    Top Answer:One thing I'd appreciate is having a desktop application similar to what VMware offered. With VMware, I could download a separate client program onto my computer, allowing me to log in directly rather… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    14,358
    Comparisons
    11,729
    Reviews
    30
    Average Words per Review
    405
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    620
    Comparisons
    227
    Reviews
    29
    Average Words per Review
    772
    Rating
    9.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS Azure File Storage
    Nutanix Files Storage, Nutanix Volumes Block Storage, Nutanix Objects Storage
    Learn More
    Overview

    Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

    Key scenarios:

    • Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
    • Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
    • Integrate modern applications with File storage
    • Simplify hosting for high availability workload data

    Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) is a software-defined storage solution that consolidates seamless access and management of siloed block, file, and object storage into a single platform. Leveraging the Nutanix Cloud Platform, NUS is built for scale, performance, and integrated data security requirements of modern applications deployed on core, cloud, or edge.

    Sample Customers
    Talon, Camden
    JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, Volkswagen SAIC, Brighton and Hove City Council, Foresters Financial, Janus International Group, Cloud Comrade, Serco
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Construction Company19%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Healthcare Company16%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Construction Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization32%
    Computer Software Company29%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    Financial Services Firm4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise38%
    Large Enterprise49%
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Nutanix Unified Storage
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Nutanix Unified Storage and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Azure File Storage is ranked 1st in Public Cloud Storage Services with 41 reviews while Nutanix Unified Storage is ranked 7th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 39 reviews. Microsoft Azure File Storage is rated 8.2, while Nutanix Unified Storage is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure File Storage writes "Various storage options available, high availability, and quick deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Unified Storage writes "Provides good performance, longer uptime, and an easy way to manage our data". Microsoft Azure File Storage is most compared with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Azure NetApp Files, Wasabi, Amazon S3 and Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store), whereas Nutanix Unified Storage is most compared with Dell PowerScale (Isilon), Red Hat Ceph Storage, MinIO, Dell ECS and Wasabi. See our Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Nutanix Unified Storage report.

    See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

    We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.