We performed a comparison between Microsoft OneDrive and OpenText Content Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms."It was extremely easy to setup."
"We use Microsoft OneDrive for file sharing without the need for additional hardware (such as flash drives or external hard drives)."
"Ability to share documents."
"The stability of Microsoft OneDrive is very good, it is reliable. There were multiple instances where I had lost my valuable data on hard drives in several other places. However, with Microsoft OneDrive, I've never lost a single file."
"It's pretty easy to learn. Once someone taught me, I was able to navigate it quite easily."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the amount of space allotted to each user that is issued a subscription."
"Image management is great since the search is simple, and accessing images with labels is easy."
"One of the good features is that the users are not even aware that they're using it."
"An advantage is integration with your IP directory."
"We like how the solution allows us to have retention of records and workflows, as well as its fire plan."
"The tool's implementation has made life easier for customers. It is sold by SAP. The integration between SAP and the solution is good, making it easy to access the documents. It is widely recognized as a market leader in enterprise document management."
"The product can be integrated with different solutions."
"It has a robust search but has often been difficult for people to learn."
"I did not face issues with the product's scalability...The solution's technical support is good."
"I would advice not storage sensitive information since it could be prone to hacking."
"An online video player would be great, since sometimes you have to download the video to play it."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"Technical support is not very impressive and is typical of large company software support."
"If I want to pick out certain criteria of pictures, Google enables me to do that whereas OneDrive is a bit sort of flaky."
"The website could be improved. Sometimes I try to login and the website has issues, I can't retrieve my documents."
"An increase in the capacity of storage in the free version would be nice."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"The ease of use should be addressed."
"Due to very limited use in the industry, vendor and contract support are hard to find."
"Support could be enhanced. The first line of support consists of individuals who lack experience with some key aspects. When you create a support ticket, the time to resolve the issue may be prolonged because the first person may not understand the system or the solution."
"The product could improve its scalability."
"The stability of the solution is an area of concern where improvements can be made."
"OpenText Content Manager needs to improve its user interface. Its installation process is difficult and can be made easier."
Microsoft OneDrive is ranked 4th in Content Collaboration Platforms with 19 reviews while OpenText Content Manager is ranked 10th in Enterprise Content Management with 21 reviews. Microsoft OneDrive is rated 8.2, while OpenText Content Manager is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft OneDrive writes "A transparent and self-explanatory storage system for data and files". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Content Manager writes "A document management system that integrates well with SAP, Salesforce and Oracle ". Microsoft OneDrive is most compared with SharePoint, Dropbox, Box, Atlassian Confluence and Citrix ShareFile, whereas OpenText Content Manager is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM, OpenText Documentum, IBM FileNet and Alfresco.
We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
