We performed a comparison between Cegid and Oracle Taleo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Talent Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Performance appraisal might be the most valuable feature for us."
"The tool provides a lot of options."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the payment engine."
"The most valuable features of Meta4 are payroll and resource recruitment. However, all of the features in the human resource system are useful."
"The most valuable feature is you can customize every type of payroll calculation that you have."
"The solution has a great payroll engine."
"The performance appraisal is the most valuable feature."
"The support team were friendly and work in a systematic way. When contacting support you are able to add a level of priority to your case which is always respected by their team."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"Performance and goal management are good to have, based on certain client requirements where the user base isn't too large, but the most workable domain of Taleo is the recruiting module."
"It is easy to use. Requisition management and pre-screening are the two most valuable features."
"The Talent Acquisition and Headhunting features are good."
"Good integration capabilities and extensibility."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"The solution offers good benefits for administrators."
"The HR portal, training model, and development career model could all use improvement. Stability and scalability should be improved as well."
"The HR portal, training model, and the development career model all need improvement."
"The solution is a little bit slow."
"I would like to have recruitment and acquisition features added to this solution."
"In future releases, it would be useful to see reporting lines of all the team members in our business to understand who reports to whom."
"training and performance could be improved."
"Meta4 could improve by allowing users to manage things by themself."
"The user interface could be improved and the maintenance is complex when it comes to upgrades."
"The bulk recruitment feature does not work well."
"There are always going to be little caveats here and there that you might not have known about as far as changes are concerned, however, it's not business-oriented to the point where the business shuts down."
"Lacks some systems that we need."
"I don't see very valuable features in this product because it has an old way of interpreting ATS. It should be more flexible in managing datasets and data searches. The screening data is a long process in Taleo."
"It would be ideal if we could integrate the solution with Olympia. It would be helpful if we could add another support desk for an IT person. It would be great if the product was more interdisciplinary and could include IT."
"The pricing could be improved."
"In terms of Oracle Taleo as a product, there are a lot of things which can be developed; most feedback which I have heard from customers is about the dashboard and the home page, both of which are quite basic."
Cegid is ranked 24th in Talent Management with 12 reviews while Oracle Taleo is ranked 13th in Talent Management with 14 reviews. Cegid is rated 7.2, while Oracle Taleo is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Cegid writes "Facilitates reusability, loads massive data, and creates reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Taleo writes "Recruiting module is highly usable, with good performance and goal management features". Cegid is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, SAP HCM, Workday, UKG and BambooHR, whereas Oracle Taleo is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, PeopleSoft, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday and eightfold.ai. See our Cegid vs. Oracle Taleo report.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
