Matillion ETL vs webMethods.io Integration comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Matillion Logo
3,350 views|2,263 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Software AG Logo
373 views|312 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Matillion ETL and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Matillion ETL vs. webMethods.io Integration Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The tool's middle-dimensional structure significantly simplifies obtaining the right data at the appropriate level. This feature makes deploying our applications easier since we utilize a single source without publishing data from various sources.""The product has a good user interface.""It's highly scalable. It takes upon itself the Redshift scalability, so it's very good.""It is pretty user-friendly, even for people who aren't super technical.""It is an incredibly user-friendly and intuitive tool, making the learning curve quite smooth""Matillion ETL helps manage data movement, ingestion, and transformation through pipelines.""The loading of data is the most valuable feature of Matillion ETL.""The simplicity of this tool is nice. It has a good graphical user interface. You can also do a lot of generic stuff in the tool. If there is good connectivity to a cloud database, such as Snowflake, and you can have a lot of Snowflake functionality in the tool."

More Matillion ETL Pros →

"I like the tool's scalability.""There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility.""The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product.""Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature.""The solution is scalable.""Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration.""It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."

More webMethods.io Integration Pros →

Cons
"In the next release, we would like to have connections to more databases.""While the UI is good, it could be improved in its efficiency and made easier to use.""It needs integration with more data sources.""I found some of the more complex aspects of ETL challenging, but I grasped the concepts fairly quickly.""Performance can be improved for efficiency, and it can be made faster.""Our main challenge currently is that Matillion runs on an EC2 instance, limiting us to running only two processes simultaneously at the entry level.""To complete the pipeline, they might want to include some connectors which would put the data into different platforms. This would be helpful.""There are certain functions that are available in other ETL tools which are still not present in Matillion ETL. It would be good to have more features."

More Matillion ETL Cons →

"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors.""Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved.""It is difficult to maintain.""The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required.""The solution's release management feature could be better.""The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols.""I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."

More webMethods.io Integration Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I have heard from my manager and other higher ups, "This product is cheaper than other things on the market," and they have done the research."
  • "It is cost-effective. Based on our use case, it's efficient and cheap. It saves a lot of money and our upfront costs are less."
  • "The prices needs to be lower."
  • "It was very easy to purchase through the AWS Marketplace, but it was also expensive."
  • "Purchasing it through the AWS Marketplace is pretty convenient. There is a little bit of back and forth in terms of the licensing based on the machine size, but it seems to have worked out well. it is convenient to have it all as part of our AWS billing."
  • "It is not necessarily a cheap solution. However, it's reasonable priced, especially with the smaller machines that we run it on."
  • "The AWS pricing and licensing are a cost-effective solution for data integration needs."
  • "It was procured through the AWS Marketplace because it keeps things simple. They offer retail-like checkout and bill through your existing Amazon Web Services account."
  • More Matillion ETL Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is a yearly license."
  • "webMethods.io Integration's pricing is high and has yearly subscription costs."
  • More webMethods.io Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is an incredibly user-friendly and intuitive tool, making the learning curve quite smooth
    Top Answer:We pay $5.40 per EC2 running hour, and we can reduce costs by stopping and starting the EC2 instances strategically. For instance, in our production environment, we run it for sixteen hours a day… more »
    Top Answer:There's room for improvement in how it handles data streaming capabilities. Our main challenge currently is that Matillion runs on an EC2 instance, limiting us to running only two processes… more »
    Top Answer:The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product.
    Top Answer:The main reason my company decided to replace webMethods.io Integration is because of the integration capabilities in the newer versions of the tool. Whenever there is a new version of webMethods.io… more »
    Top Answer:In my company, the solution is used for SAP Integration.
    Ranking
    4th
    Views
    3,350
    Comparisons
    2,263
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    701
    Rating
    8.6
    22nd
    Views
    373
    Comparisons
    312
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    416
    Rating
    7.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Matillion ETL for Redshift, Matillion ETL for Snowflake, Matillion ETL for BigQuery
    webMethods Integration Cloud, Software AG webMethods Integration Cloud
    Learn More
    Overview

    Matillion ETL is a powerful tool for extracting, transforming, and loading large amounts of data from various sources into cloud data warehouses like Snowflake. Its ability to load data dynamically and efficiently using metadata is a standout feature, as is its open-source ETL with good performance and high efficiency. 

    The solution has a graphical interface for jobs, is easily adjustable and extensible, and allows for scheduling and error reporting. Matillion ETL has helped organizations move to a cloud-based solution, bridge the gap between on-premises and on-cloud, and perform complex migration projects.

    Software AG (Frankfurt MDAX: SOW) offers Freedom as a Service. We reimagine integration, spark business transformation and enable fast innovation on the Internet of Things so you can pioneer differentiating business models. We give you the freedom to connect and integrate any technology—from app to edge. We help you free data from silos so it’s shareable, usable and powerful—enabling you to make the best decisions and unlock entirely new possibilities for growth. Software AG has more than 4,700 employees, is active in 70 countries and had revenues of € 866 million in 2018.

    Sample Customers
    Thrive Market, MarketBot, PWC, Axtria, Field Nation, GE, Superdry, Quantcast, Lightbox, EDF Energy, Finn Air, IPRO, Twist, Penn National Gaming Inc
    Autosen, A1 Digital, Cintas
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company33%
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Computer Software Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise35%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Large Enterprise86%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Matillion ETL vs. webMethods.io Integration
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Matillion ETL vs. webMethods.io Integration and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Matillion ETL is ranked 4th in Cloud Data Integration with 24 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 22nd in Cloud Data Integration with 7 reviews. Matillion ETL is rated 8.6, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Matillion ETL writes "Efficient data integration and transformation with seamless cloud-native integration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". Matillion ETL is most compared with Snowflake, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Informatica PowerCenter and SSIS, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps. See our Matillion ETL vs. webMethods.io Integration report.

    See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.