We performed a comparison between Malwarebytes and Norton Security Premium [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)."The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"The stability is very good."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"I was very satisfied with Malwarebytes in terms of its antivirus abilities."
"It gets the job done, and they are consistently updating it monthly."
"The product provides notifications for suspicious events. We have several public access points. The product helps to prevent unauthorized entry. Its most valuable features are pre-installation procedures and a cloud console. The console's interface is simple and can be viewed easily to take action. It covers everything in terms of security threats."
"Being able to carry out a full scan on your system."
"The most valuable features of Malwarebytes are the EDR and the complete feature set provided."
"It is a stable solution."
"The central management of devices from different sites is a very good feature; this has made them much easier to manage."
"It is intuitive and easy to use. For the most part, it does a good job of catching things. It is good at stopping stuff. I did a couple of tests with a password cracker. I tried to load that on, and Malwarebytes didn't let me do that, which was pretty good. It has a rollback feature that I haven't seen with any other company. If one of your endpoints are hit with mass ransomware, you could actually roll it back. I watched a demo of them do that, and it was pretty sweet."
"The antivirus aspect of the solution is very good."
"With the heightened security around phishing, identity theft, and malware, this is a good product."
"It does not take many resources during scanning."
"The most valuable feature is the multifunctional protection."
"Norton Security Premium is good, and it's pretty simple to install."
"The product is called Norton 360 all-in-one. It is a full product."
"The dashboard is good."
"The internet security was a plus, and it's pretty good."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"The support needs improvement."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"The reporting is not as flexible as you would find with other antivirus software."
"Overall, I haven't found any ways the solution lacks in features or usability."
"Strictly in terms of cyber security, the release cycle should be quarterly, at most. It shouldn't be more frequent than that because, for one thing, keeping up with tech support is difficult."
"A solution must be installed in the main gateway to give an overview of the incoming and outgoing traffic. The technical support team's response time should be faster."
"We experience a lot of false positives."
"The stability and performance of the solution are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"The product update capability needs to be improved."
"They should make it faster, less taxing on the processor."
"Having a dashboard that shows the different functions of Norton Security Premium can convince end users that the software is more than just an antivirus solution. This product offers several features, but end users think that it's just one out of the box solution, because the different functions are not explained in detail."
"It would be helpful for me if this solution works on our cloud backup data."
"The solution can improve the security modules."
"Occasionally when you open a ticket, there's a lack of understanding that prevents the solution from being resolved directly."
"The product is an antivirus, it should be updated automatically when needed."
"Security Premium's cost could be lower."
"Sometimes the program is too complex."
"During scanning, sometimes, there is a heavy load on the workstation. This needs to be improved."
More Norton Security Premium [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Malwarebytes is ranked 28th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 33 reviews while Norton Security Premium [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 13 reviews. Malwarebytes is rated 8.0, while Norton Security Premium [EOL] is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Malwarebytes writes "Intuitive, easy to use, and does a good job of catching and stopping things for the most part and has a unique rollback feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Norton Security Premium [EOL] writes "User-friendly solution with good blocking". Malwarebytes is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, HP Wolf Security and Huntress, whereas Norton Security Premium [EOL] is most compared with .
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.