We performed a comparison between Magic xpi Integration Platform and Oracle Integration Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)."The stability of the solution is OK."
"The OIC is very good."
"The dashboard provided by Oracle Integration Cloud for monitoring and error handling is very intuitive."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Integration Cloud Service are the seeded integrations with many communication platforms, such as Slack and emails. It works best for the historical communication methods. Those are still prevalent with all the other clients. When we are doing the integrations, it makes it a little bit easier for us to communicate the same output over Slack, rather than sending out an email and downloading the report. The number of seeded functionalities within the Oracle Integration Cloud Service platform is better."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service is a really good product and the ROI is very good with it. It lowers development time. A development cycle that may have taken a year without Oracle Integration Cloud Service can drop down to three or four months with it."
"The lack of features in something like Oracle Integration Cloud leaves some room for leads implementation partners like us"
"OIC's accuracy is quite good."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of customization."
"The solution is scalable."
"It is not performing well."
"Lacks features for more complex integrations."
"The error retrying mechanism could be improved. If an error occurs, it can be retried automatically, it would be helpful."
"Configurable timeouts on each connection would be good."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service can improve file handling. Currently, our real-time file polling limitation is 10 MB, if that size can be increased it would be helpful. For example, increasing the size from 10 MB to 1 GB."
"There is a payload size limit and we're unable to integrate some legacy applications."
"They need to make tools framework available for implementation partners"
"Make it more similar to the on-premises features. For example, if you can edit the code directly rather than just dragging and dropping, or if you can edit the examples by going into the background, and one-click migration, I'd like to see included in the next release."
"In designer mode, sometimes the browser closure or other unknown issues can cause strange behavior, which requires a restart."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Magic xpi Integration Platform is ranked 23rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. Magic xpi Integration Platform is rated 3.0, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Magic xpi Integration Platform writes "A low-performing integration tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". Magic xpi Integration Platform is most compared with Mule ESB, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), Mule Anypoint Platform, AWS Glue, Oracle GoldenGate and Azure Data Factory.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.