Tungsten RPA vs webMethods.io Integration comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Tungsten Automation Logo
3,345 views|2,455 comparisons
82% willing to recommend
Software AG Logo
373 views|312 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Tungsten RPA and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Tungsten RPA vs. webMethods.io Integration Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low.""It is stable and scalable.""The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept. It's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated.""You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it.""The most valuable feature of Kofax RPA is the simplicity of automating tasks.""The pricing of the solution is quite good.""The product provided all the security controls that we asked them.""The drag and drop functionality is quite good."

More Tungsten RPA Pros →

"The solution is scalable.""There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility.""I like the tool's scalability.""Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration.""The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product.""It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals.""Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."

More webMethods.io Integration Pros →

Cons
"It needs a free training portal for anybody on the internet to use so that they can get an idea of what the possibilities are.""There is really nothing special about the capabilities of this product.""This product has room for improvement in support of aviation. The interface could be improved in the next release.""Kofax RPA needs to improve integration with SAP and Microsoft. The professional services offered by the tool's team is below par. Its licensing needs to be more modular.""The product needs more AI capabilities.""Kofax RPA could improve web-based automation and there should be a choice of what browser we can use, such as Google Chrome, instead of an inbuilt browser from Kofax RPA. Additionally, Kofax RPA is missing an orchestrator that other solutions have, such as UiPath.""Kofax RPA's UI could be more user-friendly.""I would like to see them further enhance the OCR, specifically in the multi-language support."

More Tungsten RPA Cons →

"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier.""The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols.""The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required.""webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors.""It is difficult to maintain.""The solution's release management feature could be better.""Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."

More webMethods.io Integration Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The normal price for an on-premises license is €50,000. That's the price for one robot license. You can have more than one robot license but only one can be run at any one time. I believe the cost of adding a second robot is around €14,000."
  • "Price is not a problem, because they are a competitor and we have a special rate."
  • "I don't have complete insight at this point in time, but I would guess that Kofax is a lot less expensive than Automation Anywhere. I would expect its license to be on a yearly basis."
  • "Its pricing is reasonable given the product capabilities. Kofax has a wide range of products, and it can sometimes be confusing to understand which capabilities come with which product set. One of the key facets that we've been looking into recently is cognitive document recognition that was a core pile of some of their other technologies such as Kofax transformation modules (KTM)."
  • "Kofax's prices are pretty reasonable."
  • "There is a standard license needed to use Kofax RPA and the price is reasonable."
  • "Kofax RPA is moderately priced but expensive in comparison to UiPath and Power Automate."
  • "I give the price of the solution a six out of ten."
  • More Tungsten RPA Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is a yearly license."
  • "webMethods.io Integration's pricing is high and has yearly subscription costs."
  • More webMethods.io Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it.
    Top Answer:The pricing model for automation solutions like Automation Anywhere, UiPath, and Microsoft Power Platform is subscription-based, where costs are calculated based on factors such as the number of hours… more »
    Top Answer:The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more… more »
    Top Answer:The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product.
    Top Answer:The main reason my company decided to replace webMethods.io Integration is because of the integration capabilities in the newer versions of the tool. Whenever there is a new version of webMethods.io… more »
    Top Answer:In my company, the solution is used for SAP Integration.
    Ranking
    Views
    3,345
    Comparisons
    2,455
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    355
    Rating
    7.2
    22nd
    Views
    373
    Comparisons
    312
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    416
    Rating
    7.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Kofax RPA, Kofax Kapow, Kapow
    webMethods Integration Cloud, Software AG webMethods Integration Cloud
    Learn More
    Overview
    Tungsten RPA offers an efficient solution for streamlining business processes through Robotic Process Automation (RPA), which utilizes software "bots" to automate tasks like data entry and form filling. With Tungsten RPA, organizations can enjoy increased efficiency as repetitive tasks are automated, freeing up human resources for more strategic work. Moreover, the software ensures improved accuracy by performing tasks consistently and error-free, leading to reduced costs and enhanced compliance with regulations. Key features include a low-code design environment for easy workflow creation, intelligent document processing for handling unstructured data, automated process discovery, and flexible deployment options suitable for on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environments. Tungsten RPA presents a comprehensive solution for optimizing operational efficiency and driving business success through automation.

    Software AG (Frankfurt MDAX: SOW) offers Freedom as a Service. We reimagine integration, spark business transformation and enable fast innovation on the Internet of Things so you can pioneer differentiating business models. We give you the freedom to connect and integrate any technology—from app to edge. We help you free data from silos so it’s shareable, usable and powerful—enabling you to make the best decisions and unlock entirely new possibilities for growth. Software AG has more than 4,700 employees, is active in 70 countries and had revenues of € 866 million in 2018.

    Sample Customers
    Aetna, BNP Paribas, Citi, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ING, Aviva, Humana, Willis, Merck, University Hospitals, CardinalHealth, American Red Cross, Alegri, Capita
    Autosen, A1 Digital, Cintas
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Energy/Utilities Company15%
    Logistics Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise66%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Large Enterprise86%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Tungsten RPA vs. webMethods.io Integration
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tungsten RPA vs. webMethods.io Integration and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 22nd in Cloud Data Integration with 7 reviews. Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps. See our Tungsten RPA vs. webMethods.io Integration report.

    See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.