We performed a comparison between KerioConnect and Veritas Enterprise Vault based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Email Archiving solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have contacted technical support a handful of times and received some assistance."
"The most valuable features are its ease of use, excellent pricing, and it is platform agnostic."
"It's relatively simple to use."
"What I like most about Kerio Connect is that it supports ActiveSync, and that is its most critical feature. The solution is also a nice, simple, robust, and stable mail server."
"The user interface is good."
"Kerio Connect is secure, flexible, and easy to control from the user interface. It has many security features able to be controlled from one place, such as anti-spam. I have found it very convenient. Additionally, you can analyze log files and share folders which is helpful."
"Organizations can streamline governance processes and improve compliance by utilizing automated classification to tag and categorize data."
"Veritas Enterprise Vault is highly stable and has low-maintenance."
"I use the solution to find data loss and restore the data."
"The most valuable feature of Veritas Enterprise Vault is the on-premise recall from your email into Outlook."
"Enterprise is a user-friendly product."
"Veritas Enterprise Vault is an archive solution for email and files."
"The indexing and searching features are the most valuable features of Veritas Enterprise Vault."
"We use the solution to archive emails."
"Having a native Outlook map integration would make Kerio Connect better."
"The solution could improve the redundancy because we only have one copy of the Kerio Connect server on our hardware. The next step for us is to move to the cloud and if Kerio does not have a cloud version available they should release one"
"I would like to see better support from their support team."
"It could be simpler to use and install, but I still wouldn't use it because there isn't a compelling use case."
"The search and archiving documentation capabilities need to be stronger."
"Most of our clients use Outlook and Kerio Connect. Occasionally, Kerio can be a bit slow. They could make it faster to get onto the web interface without so much load time. It's just slow with Outlook, however, for some reason."
"The file-level archiving is very important in Enterprise Vault 12 and this doesn't really exist in early versions."
"Cost is high for Veritas Enterprise Vault."
"Veritas Enterprise Vault's cloud backup solution should include the journal archiving feature along with the standard licensing package."
"The platform's price could be affordable for small businesses."
"The integration needs to improve."
"The solution is not user-friendly and the restoration is not fast. It's also tricky to get information from it."
"Dealing with personal information, such as documents that contain a personal number, personal ID or something like that should be improved. Sometimes it works poorly in that regard."
"The quality of support by Veritas has declined in the last year."
KerioConnect is ranked 8th in Email Archiving with 6 reviews while Veritas Enterprise Vault is ranked 2nd in Email Archiving with 13 reviews. KerioConnect is rated 5.4, while Veritas Enterprise Vault is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of KerioConnect writes "Lightweight, simple, and robust; easy to maintain and doesn't require a lot of system resources to run". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veritas Enterprise Vault writes " A solution with a user-friendly console that can be used for email and mailbox archiving". KerioConnect is most compared with Microsoft Exchange, Zimbra Collaboration, IceWarp, Microsoft Exchange Online and Google Workspace, whereas Veritas Enterprise Vault is most compared with Commvault Cloud, Microsoft Exchange, Barracuda Email Protection and Google Vault. See our KerioConnect vs. Veritas Enterprise Vault report.
See our list of best Email Archiving vendors.
We monitor all Email Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
