We performed a comparison between Keeper and Symantec Siteminder based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Password Managers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is nice to be able to use my Touch ID and have access to all my passwords in one place."
"Keeper Bridge."
"What I like the most is the fact that I can just mark anything and it is automatically copied into the clipboard."
"I like Keeper's mobility and its accessibility."
"Chrome extension and app."
"It has a secure password generator that incorporates random creation tools and good security practices, which allows for an easy, quick, organized update and sharing with a work team."
"I can access my passwords from any Internet connected device."
"Auto login across platforms allows for no copying and pasting."
"You can quickly deploy the entire product with a basic config within couple of hours."
"The single sign-on is the solution's most valuable feature"
"Ease of use is very good, for administrating it. It's very well known."
"IWA is an out-of-the-box feature. The SAML-based federation is standard for all tools. However, CA Single Sign-On has made the federation configuration way too simple and handy to set up and use."
"The solution is easy to use for our managers."
"It has the ability to authenticate and authorize users. It is the main feature for our security."
"The Directory is secure. It's our user store, and it's important to keep our members safe. The product does well with that."
"Right now, federation that comes out-of-the-box with single sign-on is the most valuable feature that we have, and also scalability."
"The user experience and the mobile app could be improved."
"Room for improvement in my eyes would be being able to share my credit cards and other types of information. The only thing they really share is passwords, and you can only do it with one password at a time. When you're trying to share it out or trying to remove it from being shared, you can't do multiple selections."
"I would love it if you didn't have to re-authenticate when you start up a new browser."
"Rearranging folders via drag/drop functionality would be very helpful."
"Ability to store 'files' from IOS & Android devices. You can store pics from these devices currently. Most file formats can be uploaded from PC's/Macs"
"Its aesthetic needs improvement."
"The technical support has no experience."
"It would be nice to see this great tool integrate with other tools out there."
"The main thing is we do not have the traceability and good monitoring that CA can provide us to capture problems when they occur."
"The tech support has not been very good for us so we don't use them anymore. We have had some issues. Nobody is perfect."
"The technical support could be better."
"In future releases, I would like to see maybe more capabilities with some more modern authentication."
"I'd like to see a rework of the user directory configuration."
"To add more value to this solution it needs to be more user-friendly."
"Better documentation. I went through some sessions on single sign-on for version 12.7."
"Some of the new protocols, like OAuth 2.0, could be improved."
Earn 20 points
Keeper is ranked 10th in Enterprise Password Managers with 32 reviews while Symantec Siteminder is ranked 17th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 69 reviews. Keeper is rated 9.2, while Symantec Siteminder is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Keeper writes "It's an inexpensive, scalable solution that has improved our security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Siteminder writes "Easy to implement and customize and very stable". Keeper is most compared with HashiCorp Vault, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, LastPass and Delinea Secret Server, whereas Symantec Siteminder is most compared with PingFederate, ForgeRock, Okta Workforce Identity, PingID and PingAccess. See our Keeper vs. Symantec Siteminder report.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
