We performed a comparison between Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Trellix Endpoint Security based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is commended for its extensive cross-platform protection, user-friendly interface, and compatibility with third-party software. Trellix Endpoint Security is highly valued for its easy administration options and reliability. Kaspersky users requested improvements in security and stability. They also want better documentation, faster malware scanning, enhanced encryption, and improved remote management. Reviews suggest that Trellix could reduce resource consumption and improve user-friendliness.
Service and Support: Users say that Kaspersky’s support is helpful and responsive, whether it comes from resellers, partners, or the vendor. Some users have found the support for Trellix Endpoint Security helpful and reliable, while others have encountered ineffective assistance and communication problems.
Ease of Deployment: Some reported that Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is straightforward to setup, while others find it more complex and time-consuming. The setup process for Trellix Endpoint Security varies in difficulty, depending on the user's experience with McAfee and general technical expertise.
Pricing: Users gave mixed feedback on the price of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. Some found it reasonable while others thought it was expensive. Some find Trellix’s price reasonable and competitive, while others believe it could be lowered.
ROI: Our reviewers said that Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has proven to be a solid investment. Trellix Endpoint Security provides significant time savings.
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"It is stable and scalable."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business's most valuable feature is the ease of management."
"The performance is good. It doesn't use a lot of resources, which is crucial for us."
"I am impressed with the tool's main dashboard, anti-malware application blocking, DDoS, etc."
"Ability to specify the level of protection on devices,"
"The solution is very easy to use. It's an extremely user-friendly product."
"Endpoint Security is efficient and easy to use. It doesn't slow the performance of your personal computer."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides total security, everything in one."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the daily updates and protection from virus attacks."
"The product helps us by contacting us if there are any virus attacks on our system."
"The solution is stable."
"The loss prevention feature would be the most valuable."
"The package of protection that it provides is useful. It has antivirus, malware protection, VPN, and a whole bunch of other features."
"The product is easy to use."
"I have found the most valuable features to be the ability to manage the solution from anywhere and having an overview of the companies security."
"The endpoint protection and disk encryption features are the most valuable."
"One valuable feature is Threat Prevention with the on-demand scan."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"The support needs improvement."
"The application updates and drive encryption are lacking."
"I rate the pricing five out of ten."
"Maybe the solution's monitoring could be improved with more dashboards, so there's no back and forth, back and forth."
"It would be great if, as an additional feature, you could download updates without deploying updates to end users."
"The GUI mode in the product is an area with certain shortcomings since it looks old with the graphics provided by Kaspersky."
"The performance level could be better."
"It would be preferable if the product were more proactive and more modern in its approach to security and protection."
"It would be nice if it was less expensive."
"I would like this solution to do what Palo Alto traps does because I would only need to run this one product."
"Trying to move away from the signature model for antivirus and malware blocking is something that would be nice. Instead of having to update every day, which is signature-based, moving to more of a kernel or architecture-based model would probably be beneficial."
"Trellix lacked email protection when it was a McAfee product. They added this feature during the merger with FireEye, but it hasn't been fully integrated. The core features will be integrated into the next release. FireEye has several solutions for EDR and sandboxing."
"McAfee GW Security and McAfee Child Safety need some improvement as they are relatively new."
"The solution's technical support should be improved since we faced a lot of issues with the support. There were some delays in responses from the technical support."
"I think it would be nice if Dynamic Application Control would come together with McAfee Endpoint Security."
"The VirusScan needs to improve in order to detect ransomware and other advanced threats."
"The management console is a little bit difficult to understand for admins. You need a lot of time in order to become familiar with that. It is a little bit complicated and not too easy to understand. Its price can also be improved. Its price is higher than its competitors. McAfee also needs to have better cloud integration and more data centers in the EU. The cloud center should be in Europe or in Germany. In Germany, it is really important to have access to your data within the same country. Customer data needs to be placed and processed in the same country."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Pricing and Cost Advice →
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is ranked 11th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 108 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 12th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 94 reviews. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is rated 8.2, while Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business writes "Easy to setup, stable and good security use cases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Fortinet FortiClient, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Trend Micro Apex One, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Cisco Secure Endpoint. See our Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. Trellix Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) vendors.
We monitor all EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.