Jitterbit Harmony vs SAP Process Orchestration comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Jitterbit Logo
378 views|322 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SAP Logo
3,771 views|1,590 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Jitterbit Harmony and SAP Process Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Jitterbit Harmony vs. SAP Process Orchestration Report (Updated: September 2023).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The Cloud Console for monitoring and troubleshooting data operations.""We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate.""Jitterbit provides the ability to quickly map data between files and databases.""Integrity, ease of use, user-friendly user interface, and errorless logs are the most valuable features.""Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried.""It is a scalable solution.""The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors).""It is very easy to build integrations and processes to pull and push data."

More Jitterbit Harmony Pros →

"The product has good technical support but you usually will not need it because it is quite stable.""Great monitoring tools and has its own alert framework.""It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.""The monitoring is one of the greatest features in Process Orchestration because it is user-friendly and easy for somebody who is not experienced.""SAP Process Orchestration has all the features that are necessary.""The solution is easy to use.""t is a pretty stable solution. I have not seen any outages in the solution.""The most valuable feature of SAP Process Orchestration is its flexibility in being able to build integrations with SAP systems and non-SAP systems."

More SAP Process Orchestration Pros →

Cons
"The initial setup can be a little bit difficult.""Its API management capabilities need improvement.""Looping through complex data structures can be difficult.""I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security.""In the past few months, there have been some server downtimes during work hours that have affected some critical scheduled integrations.""You need to have some development skills or hire a Jitterbit engineer to make changes.""I know with Salesforce updating the UI like they did, it slowed it down a lot.""Sometimes additional connectors are needed."

More Jitterbit Harmony Cons →

"The cloud capability features need improvement.""The usability is an area where it can be improved upon.""The solution could improve by making it more user-friendly by limiting the code required. We have to add some code in some cases where we need complex logic or some other functions. If this was able to be done in a more simplified manner then it would save a lot of effort and time.""It is scalable, but there can be performance issues with high data volume or traffic, especially during month ends.""It is not a scalable solution for the cloud. I would not recommend this for the cloud.""It does not have all of the industry-standard solutions available in PO and it is not plug and play, so we have to do a lot of development.""It would be beneficial to enhance the ease of implementing new projects and improve overall stability in our implementations.""The responsiveness of technical support needs to be improved."

More SAP Process Orchestration Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Each business needs to determine if it is a mission critical aspect."
  • "The added bonus is that Jitterbit doesn't charge for any data volume/traffic."
  • "I do believe Jitterbit has one of the better pricing and licensing options out there compared to its competitors."
  • "Jitterbit was extremely cost effective for us compared to other options."
  • "The Jitterbit price is based upon endpoints. They also offer ERP connectors with their Enterprise edition"
  • "The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors."
  • More Jitterbit Harmony Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good."
  • "The pricing for this solution is fine."
  • "There are fees in addition to the licensing."
  • "It's not an expensive solution."
  • "Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive."
  • "The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution."
  • "The price of SAP Process Orchestration was reasonable."
  • "The fee for maintenance is costly."
  • More SAP Process Orchestration Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors. I rate its pricing a six out of ten.
    Top Answer:The solution's API management capabilities need improvement.
    Top Answer: It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.
    Top Answer:We subscribe to annual licenses, and the competitive license cost is reasonable. We find that the cost is even more affordable compared to other options available in the market.
    Top Answer:Implementing changes and introducing new interfaces in Process Orchestration should have been more straightforward. The current system is burdened with a heavy load and has become overly complex… more »
    Ranking
    18th
    Views
    378
    Comparisons
    322
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    234
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    3,771
    Comparisons
    1,590
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    394
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Jitterbit, Jitterbit Harmony
    SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration
    Learn More
    Overview

    Open source integration platform designed to handle the most complex integration challenges between legacy, enterprise and On-Demand applications. 

    SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.
    Sample Customers
    LA Metro, Mophie, Club Auto, University of Miami, Exostar, Dialog Direct, Avero, Greenpoint Technologies, Berklee Online, Odyssey, KeyedIn Solutions, Swish Maintenance, SPP Pumps Limited, Talent Plus, Ricoh Canada, Televerde, Reed Construction Data, Sika US, Sunkist Growers
    Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company30%
    Wholesaler/Distributor17%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business67%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise58%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Jitterbit Harmony vs. SAP Process Orchestration
    September 2023
    Find out what your peers are saying about Jitterbit Harmony vs. SAP Process Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: September 2023.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Jitterbit Harmony is ranked 18th in Cloud Data Integration with 13 reviews while SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews. Jitterbit Harmony is rated 8.6, while SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Jitterbit Harmony writes "An easy-to-setup solution with good stability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". Jitterbit Harmony is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Azure Data Factory, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Mule Anypoint Platform and SnapLogic, whereas SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, SAP Data Services, webMethods Integration Server, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services and IBM B2B Integrator. See our Jitterbit Harmony vs. SAP Process Orchestration report.

    See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.