Jitterbit Harmony vs Matillion ETL comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Jitterbit Harmony and Matillion ETL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Data Integration Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Jitterbit provides the ability to quickly map data between files and databases.""Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried.""It is a scalable solution.""We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate.""It is very easy to build integrations and processes to pull and push data.""It runs like an appliance and has tremendous throughput.""The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors).""The Cloud Console for monitoring and troubleshooting data operations."

More Jitterbit Harmony Pros →

"It is pretty user-friendly, even for people who aren't super technical.""The tool's middle-dimensional structure significantly simplifies obtaining the right data at the appropriate level. This feature makes deploying our applications easier since we utilize a single source without publishing data from various sources.""The loading of data is the most valuable feature of Matillion ETL.""We allow non-technical people to use Matillion to load data into our data warehouse for reporting. Thus, it is easy enough to use that we don't always have to get a technical person involved in setting up a data movement (ETL).""The technical support treats us well. They already have a support portal, and they are responsive, which helps.""It takes less than five minutes to set up and delivers results. It is much quicker than traditional ETL technologies.""It's been able to do everything we require.""It has helped us to get onto the cloud quickly."

More Matillion ETL Pros →

Cons
"I know with Salesforce updating the UI like they did, it slowed it down a lot.""I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security.""The initial setup can be a little bit difficult.""Sometimes additional connectors are needed.""Looping through complex data structures can be difficult.""You need to have some development skills or hire a Jitterbit engineer to make changes.""Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs.""Its API management capabilities need improvement."

More Jitterbit Harmony Cons →

"To complete the pipeline, they might want to include some connectors which would put the data into different platforms. This would be helpful.""The current version is a bit more limited because it's on a virtual machine, and everything executes on that one virtual machine.""The tool's lineage is very weak.""Unlike Snowflake which automatically takes care of upgrading to the latest version and includes additional features, with Matillion ETL we need to do this ourselves.""Our main challenge currently is that Matillion runs on an EC2 instance, limiting us to running only two processes simultaneously at the entry level.""Going forward, I would like them to add custom jobs, since we still have to run these outside of Matillion.""It needs integration with more data sources.""There are certain functions that are available in other ETL tools which are still not present in Matillion ETL. It would be good to have more features."

More Matillion ETL Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Each business needs to determine if it is a mission critical aspect."
  • "The added bonus is that Jitterbit doesn't charge for any data volume/traffic."
  • "I do believe Jitterbit has one of the better pricing and licensing options out there compared to its competitors."
  • "Jitterbit was extremely cost effective for us compared to other options."
  • "The Jitterbit price is based upon endpoints. They also offer ERP connectors with their Enterprise edition"
  • "The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors."
  • More Jitterbit Harmony Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I have heard from my manager and other higher ups, "This product is cheaper than other things on the market," and they have done the research."
  • "It is cost-effective. Based on our use case, it's efficient and cheap. It saves a lot of money and our upfront costs are less."
  • "The prices needs to be lower."
  • "It was very easy to purchase through the AWS Marketplace, but it was also expensive."
  • "Purchasing it through the AWS Marketplace is pretty convenient. There is a little bit of back and forth in terms of the licensing based on the machine size, but it seems to have worked out well. it is convenient to have it all as part of our AWS billing."
  • "It is not necessarily a cheap solution. However, it's reasonable priced, especially with the smaller machines that we run it on."
  • "The AWS pricing and licensing are a cost-effective solution for data integration needs."
  • "It was procured through the AWS Marketplace because it keeps things simple. They offer retail-like checkout and bill through your existing Amazon Web Services account."
  • More Matillion ETL Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors. I rate its pricing a six out of ten.
    Top Answer:The solution's API management capabilities need improvement.
    Top Answer:It is an incredibly user-friendly and intuitive tool, making the learning curve quite smooth
    Top Answer:We pay $5.40 per EC2 running hour, and we can reduce costs by stopping and starting the EC2 instances strategically. For instance, in our production environment, we run it for sixteen hours a day… more »
    Top Answer:There's room for improvement in how it handles data streaming capabilities. Our main challenge currently is that Matillion runs on an EC2 instance, limiting us to running only two processes… more »
    Ranking
    19th
    Views
    407
    Comparisons
    349
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    234
    Rating
    9.0
    4th
    Views
    3,495
    Comparisons
    2,369
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    701
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Jitterbit, Jitterbit Harmony
    Matillion ETL for Redshift, Matillion ETL for Snowflake, Matillion ETL for BigQuery
    Learn More
    Overview

    Open source integration platform designed to handle the most complex integration challenges between legacy, enterprise and On-Demand applications. 

    Matillion ETL is a powerful tool for extracting, transforming, and loading large amounts of data from various sources into cloud data warehouses like Snowflake. Its ability to load data dynamically and efficiently using metadata is a standout feature, as is its open-source ETL with good performance and high efficiency. 

    The solution has a graphical interface for jobs, is easily adjustable and extensible, and allows for scheduling and error reporting. Matillion ETL has helped organizations move to a cloud-based solution, bridge the gap between on-premises and on-cloud, and perform complex migration projects.

    Sample Customers
    LA Metro, Mophie, Club Auto, University of Miami, Exostar, Dialog Direct, Avero, Greenpoint Technologies, Berklee Online, Odyssey, KeyedIn Solutions, Swish Maintenance, SPP Pumps Limited, Talent Plus, Ricoh Canada, Televerde, Reed Construction Data, Sika US, Sunkist Growers
    Thrive Market, MarketBot, PWC, Axtria, Field Nation, GE, Superdry, Quantcast, Lightbox, EDF Energy, Finn Air, IPRO, Twist, Penn National Gaming Inc
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Healthcare Company9%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company36%
    Financial Services Firm36%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business67%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise58%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Data Integration
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Jitterbit Harmony is ranked 19th in Cloud Data Integration with 13 reviews while Matillion ETL is ranked 4th in Cloud Data Integration with 22 reviews. Jitterbit Harmony is rated 8.6, while Matillion ETL is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Jitterbit Harmony writes "An easy-to-setup solution with good stability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Matillion ETL writes "Efficient data integration and transformation with seamless cloud-native integration". Jitterbit Harmony is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Azure Data Factory, Mule Anypoint Platform, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Boomi AtomSphere Integration, whereas Matillion ETL is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Snowflake, AWS Glue, Informatica PowerCenter and SSIS.

    See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.