We performed a comparison between Informatica Cloud Data Integration and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The Mapping Designer allows for declarative ETL development (visual scripting) that leverages a wide array of different transformations."
"We have a lot of integrations, and it's very easy to create integrations. They have a lot of connectors."
"It has a more UI-based tool, and the scripting is good."
"It has all the advantages of the Cloud in that you can use it without worrying about infrastructure, upkeep, or upgrades."
"Informatica Cloud Data Integration is stable."
"Informatica is good for integrating data and cloud applications. We have connectors for integrating cloud applications like Salesforce. You can quickly integrate anything with an exposed API or a REST API. The industry is increasingly shifting to the cloud, so we need more products that can connect to cloud-based applications. The integration is seamless and works in real time. It's also secure because you don't need to expose databases or tables."
"The user interface which is very easy to use if we have any problems to solve."
"The most valuable feature is the building of mockups and tasks."
"webMethods Integration Server is an easy-to-use solution and does not require a lot of coding."
"Given that you have one integration API in place, it takes very minimal effort to scale it to any other application that might want to use the same. Its flow-based development environment is a breeze and makes it really easy to re-use most of the existing components and build up a new API."
"A product with good API and EDI components."
"Application integrations are offered out-of-the-box, and that is extremely important to us. This is one of the main use cases that we have for it. It is about 60 to 70 percent of the workload in our application today."
"webMethods platform is used to build an EAI platform, enabling communication between many internal systems and third-party operators."
"Broker and UM are the best features."
"We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting."
"The most valuable feature is stability."
"A general improvement in icons and the virtual interface would be good."
"It would be helpful if there was a GenAI feature integrated into the system, especially regarding the data quality."
"Performance also needs to be significantly improved, especially when connecting to SFDC for read and write operations."
"There may be some types of limitations with the performance."
"I would also like to have profiling functionalities and quality transformations in the cloud."
"The vendor should have more training resources: online classes, free tutorial videos, etc."
"The current features are a bit complicated, and we need to write big scripts and test."
"The error information provided is not informative, as compared to Power Center."
"It is quite expensive."
"For code version control, you need to use some external software."
"I'd like to see the admin portal for managing the integration server go up a level, to have more capabilities and to be given a more modern web interface."
"This product is for larger companies. Compared to TIBCO I think webMethods is better in terms of ease of use and support."
"t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData."
"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."
"The market webMethods Integration Server falls under is a very crowded market, so for the product to stand out, Software AG would need to get traction in the open source community by releasing a new version or a base version and open source it, so people can create new custom components and add it to the portfolio."
"Support is expensive."
More Informatica Cloud Data Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Informatica Cloud Data Integration is ranked 5th in Cloud Data Integration with 38 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) with 60 reviews. Informatica Cloud Data Integration is rated 7.8, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Data Integration writes "A stable, scalable, and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Informatica Cloud Data Integration is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Fivetran and Mule Anypoint Platform, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with webMethods.io Integration, IBM Integration Bus, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Oracle Service Bus. See our Informatica Cloud Data Integration vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.