We performed a comparison between Informatica Cloud Data Integration and SAS Data Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has become an easy way to exchange information through any cloud application."
"The solution is straightforward."
"It is one of the best tools available for data integration."
"The product improves data quality."
"It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"We have a lot of integrations, and it's very easy to create integrations. They have a lot of connectors."
"It is quite easy to use and flexible."
"Informatica Cloud Data Integration is stable."
"The solution is very stable. We haven't faced any issues with glitches or bugs. We haven't had any crashes."
"The product offers very good flexibility."
"If you compare it to SQL, the memory and development times are very quick."
"This is an established product with powerful data analysis and varied options for user entry points."
"The tool is reliable, quick, and powerful."
"Its robustness is valuable. It is a full-fledged suite. We have a data warehouse model, and there are also a lot of data quality management tools. The repository and all other tools are there. So, it is a full package in terms of reporting tools."
"I am impressed with the tool's ability to customize."
"The technical support is excellent."
"I have received feedback from certain teams and there is a steep learning curve to use this solution."
"There may be some types of limitations with the performance."
"Connectivity could be improved, it can be a little slow."
"Informatica Cloud Data Integration could improve the price by making it less expensive."
"It could be improved by including a buffer that saves data when there is a connectivity issue."
"Certain applications are not being synced with the ION."
"Cost-wise, it could be better."
"Its features for partitioning and optimization could be better."
"The solution could use better documentation."
"With SAS Data Management, you have to purchase an external driver, configure all of the tables for all of the data that you will extract from Salesforce. It's not a straightforward process."
"We find we often have to go back and re-train users when there are changes made to the solution because the changes are not intuitive."
"The solution is quite expensive and hard to install/configure."
"We implemented it a while ago, and we are trying to improve the data delivery performance. We are looking into how to get faster and automated reporting. We would need better designs and workflows."
"I would like the tool to include the ability to automate the modifications of the integrations."
"The pricing of the solution needs to be improved. They need to work to make it more affordable."
"Very little needs to improve but perhaps a nicer graphic interface and remaining competetive in the growing field of data analytics."
More Informatica Cloud Data Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Informatica Cloud Data Integration is ranked 5th in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews while SAS Data Management is ranked 43rd in Data Integration with 15 reviews. Informatica Cloud Data Integration is rated 7.8, while SAS Data Management is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Data Integration writes "A stable, scalable, and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Data Management writes "A scalable solution with customer support that is responsive and diligent". Informatica Cloud Data Integration is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Fivetran and Mule Anypoint Platform, whereas SAS Data Management is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Tungsten RPA, Microsoft Purview, IBM InfoSphere DataStage and Palantir Foundry. See our Informatica Cloud Data Integration vs. SAS Data Management report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.