Imprivata OneSign vs PingFederate comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Imprivata Logo
1,072 views|632 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Ping Identity Logo
2,921 views|2,475 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Imprivata OneSign and PingFederate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO).
To learn more, read our detailed Single Sign-On (SSO) Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It has benefited my organization in the way that it makes it more secure by making it harder to hack.""It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important feature of this solution."

More Imprivata OneSign Pros →

"The most valuable feature is multifactor authentication.""PingFederate gives you granular control over the settings. There are many options for fine-tuning policies.""PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tools like ForgeRock and Okta, but I find PingFederate to be the most customizable.""It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

More PingFederate Pros →

Cons
"They should have a landing page.""I would like for them to make this solution compatible with Mac OS. I would also like for them to provide a portal so that users can easily integrate it with their applications."

More Imprivata OneSign Cons →

"Notifications and monitoring are two areas with shortcomings in the solution that need improvement.""Currently, the main integration is SAML-based, but other integration methodologies need to be supported.""It requires some expertise to set up and manage.""PingFederate's UI could be streamlined. They have recently made several improvements, but it's still too complex. It's a common complaint. The configuration should be simplified because the learning curve is too steep."

More PingFederate Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price is reasonable, it's an affordable solution."
  • "At the moment, I believe the price is reasonable."
  • More Imprivata OneSign Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."
  • More PingFederate Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important feature of this solution.
    Top Answer:They provide a license key. I am not able to disclose the pricing information. At the moment, I believe the price is reasonable.
    Top Answer:It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:Notifications and monitoring are two areas with shortcomings in the solution that need improvement.
    Top Answer:In my company, we use PingFederate for federated connections and some ADC connections to arrange for single sign-on across our infrastructure and customers.
    Ranking
    12th
    Views
    1,072
    Comparisons
    632
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    364
    Rating
    10.0
    10th
    Views
    2,921
    Comparisons
    2,475
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    404
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    OneSign, Imprivata OneSign Authentication Management
    Learn More
    Ping Identity
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Imprivata OneSign delivers fast, secure no-click-access to the applications and information that care providers need, whenever and wherever they need it.

    Security and regulatory compliance requirements mandate user authentication technology for accessing workstations and applications. As a result, care providers need to enter unique usernames and passwords (or PINs) for order signing, documentation signing, medication reconciliation and most other applications throughout their workflow. These laborious login requirements can disrupt clinical focus and obstruct patient care.

    PingFederate is an enterprise federation server that enables user authentication and single sign-on. It serves as a global authentication authority that allows employees, customers and partners to securely access all the applications they need from any device. PingFederate easily integrates with applications across the enterprise, third-party authentication sources, diverse user directories and existing IAM systems, all while supporting current and past versions of identity standards like OAuth, OpenID Connect, SAML and WS-Federation. And it can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud, so you can support today’s needs and future-proof your business for tomorrow’s requirements.

    Sample Customers
    AZ Groeninge, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust, Mahaska Health Partnership, Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Boulder Community Hospital, City of Marietta, Spencer Hospital, Southwest Washington Medical Center, South Shore Hospital
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization40%
    Healthcare Company21%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Government5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm28%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Educational Organization10%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise48%
    Large Enterprise34%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Single Sign-On (SSO)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: April 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Imprivata OneSign is ranked 12th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews while PingFederate is ranked 10th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 4 reviews. Imprivata OneSign is rated 9.0, while PingFederate is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Imprivata OneSign writes "Reasonably priced, performs well, easy to deploy, and has responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PingFederate writes " A highly stable tool offering extremely helpful technical support to its users". Imprivata OneSign is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Evidian Enterprise SSO, Okta Workforce Identity, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and OneLogin by One Identity, whereas PingFederate is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Symantec Siteminder, PingID, Microsoft Active Directory and AWS IAM Identity Center.

    See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

    We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.