We performed a comparison between IFS Cloud Platform and Symantec Asset Management Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC, Freshworks and others in IT Asset Management."We could quickly understand what was going on and what the customer wanted to do."
"The solution overall is very versatile and flexible, especially compared to other products."
"What I like about IFS Applications is that it's easier to use and implement than SAP. I also like that the IFS Applications team is more flexible than the SAP team."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine or ten out of ten since it is an extremely scalable solution that can be used for various use cases with thousands of users."
"The most valuable features of IFS Applications are their intuitiveness and ease of use. The navigations are also straightforward, which makes it easy to train users. The feedback I always receive is that it is very user-friendly."
"The most valuable features of IFS Applications in the latest version are the new user Arena interface. It's from Apps 9, but it brings more flexibility in usage, especially around different devices, such as mobile usage, which doesn't restrict you from using a computer. We are it for the HR side, and it's proving quite good. It has a new modern feel to it similar to a standard cloud application which enhances the user experience."
"IFS Applications' best feature is the user-friendly interface that has a .NET Framework application in the front end and an Oracle database and WebLogic middleware."
"One of our favorite features is the "Info-Zone", which provides operational intelligence in flight and in context to guide both business users and support teams to productivity."
"Symantec Asset Management Suite has better features than some of its competitors, such as the Microsoft Configuration Manager."
"There should be some improvements in the predefined templates in IFS Applications."
"Technical support could be improved."
"An area for improvement would be transactions, which can be tedious to complete as the process is very complex."
"IFS Applications is not robust enough to handle high-volume transactions, so it's not suitable for larger enterprises."
"We have upgraded to the latest version right now. We have issues with the quality. We tried to enroll in their Evergreen program which was meant to help us adopt any service update or anything that the tool’s providers come up with."
"The solution's initial setup process was complex...The technical support my company receives from the implementation partners of the solution is not that great."
"There were initial difficulties when I started using the application."
"There are certain digital features that need to be incorporated, such as IOP."
"The solution has not been updated in a while and parts appear to be outdated, such as the pictures. It is a reactive product in terms of development and features. They do not follow the market trends or have many innovations."
More Symantec Asset Management Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IFS Cloud Platform is ranked 8th in IT Asset Management with 29 reviews while Symantec Asset Management Suite is ranked 26th in IT Asset Management. IFS Cloud Platform is rated 7.8, while Symantec Asset Management Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IFS Cloud Platform writes "Robust, customizable, and modern". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Asset Management Suite writes "Plenty of features, stable, and scalable". IFS Cloud Platform is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP S/4HANA, Oracle E-Business Suite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and IBM Maximo, whereas Symantec Asset Management Suite is most compared with .
See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors and best License Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
