IFS Cloud Platform vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IFS Cloud Platform and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Asset Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed IFS Cloud Platform vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The main reason for the ERP project was to bring together our fourteen sites, which had until then worked in separate silos.""IFS has been completely rebuilt, modernized, and cloud-based so we don't need bulky software installations.""We could quickly understand what was going on and what the customer wanted to do.""The best feature is the maintenance module, which is essentially an industry-specific workflow designed with a manufacturing module as per industry standards. It's very precise and specific without having complex functionalities. It's straightforward. Field Service Management is definitely a wonderful product that IFS has developed because it caters to field services. The energy and utility sectors can answer their business needs using the software.""One of our favorite features is the "Info-Zone", which provides operational intelligence in flight and in context to guide both business users and support teams to productivity.""There tends not to be a massive weakness in the product itself, as weaknesses can quickly be resolved in the next patch or the next release.""When it comes to financing, the solution has helped us to concentrate finance functions like accounting processes in one system. This includes about 70 internal entities around the world.""The product is quite flexible."

More IFS Cloud Platform Pros →

"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would.""The initial setup is straightforward.""The most demonstrable feature is the asset creation form, which is quite informative.""The product enables us to track our assets."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Pros →

Cons
"IFS Applications is not robust enough to handle high-volume transactions, so it's not suitable for larger enterprises.""There were initial difficulties when I started using the application.""The solution needs to improve its documentation and user-friendliness.""There should be some improvements in the predefined templates in IFS Applications.""The solution's initial setup process was complex...The technical support my company receives from the implementation partners of the solution is not that great.""The integration is a bit complex, and post-implementation support services need to be improved. They have a service center based out of Sri Lanka. The support aspect is good, but the response time is a little slower than we anticipated. In the next release, it would be better if Warehouse Management could be improvised. They have a product line that's a data warehouse management system, but it's still premature and requires a bit of enhancement.""The CRM was shaky and although this improves in Apps 10, there is room for improvement.""We would like to see AI-driven CSI functions built into the tool that would allow us to quickly tie our improvement goals to metrics and activities, so Assyst will suggest the next steps to help us get closer to our goals."

More IFS Cloud Platform Cons →

"The UI and UX need severe improvements.""The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would.""The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal.""The solution’s depreciation calculation setup needs to be improved because it is slightly disintegrated."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is better to buy implementation services from IFS than from partners"
  • "Licensing is on an annual basis, with no additional costs."
  • "Ask for all-inclusive pricing, as they are pretty flexible if you ask for custom models."
  • "Pricing is an area that could be improved. They could be more competitive."
  • "IFS Applications is expensive software, but it's on par with SAP and Oracle. It's for large enterprises and government entities and not for small and medium-sized enterprises. They have one licensing model, but if you want to have a module-specific license, they provide component-based licenses. Unlike SAP and Oracle, it doesn't have different levels of licensing. It's one level of licensing."
  • "There's an additional yearly cost for support."
  • "There are varying license levels that you can purchase."
  • "IFS Applications are competitive in terms of pricing compared to other vendors, such as SAP, Oracle, and Epicor. They are generally cheaper, especially for licensing costs."
  • More IFS Cloud Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine or ten out of ten since it is an extremely scalable solution that can be used for various use cases with thousands of users.
    Top Answer:IFS Cloud Platform is not a cheap solution, and it is an extremely functional one. I consider it to be a well-priced solution compared to other mid-range or high-end ERP solutions. From a price… more »
    Top Answer:I think that with the latest version of the product in the cloud, the user experience is very good since it is highly configurable and very capable software. I have seen that one of the areas that my… more »
    Top Answer:The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal.
    Top Answer:I recommend the product to others. Overall, I rate the solution a nine and a half out of ten.
    Ranking
    Views
    607
    Comparisons
    411
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    817
    Rating
    7.8
    Views
    208
    Comparisons
    178
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    355
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IFS Applications, Assyst, IFS Cloud
    Learn More
    Overview

    IFS develops and delivers cloud enterprise software for companies around the world who manufacture and distribute goods, build and maintain assets, and manage service-focused operations. Within our single platform, our industry specific products are innately connected to a single data model and use embedded digital innovation so that our customers can be their best when it really matters to their customers – at the Moment of Service​​​​​​​. The industry expertise of our people and of our growing ecosystem, together with a commitment to deliver value at every single step, has made IFS a recognized leader and the most recommended supplier in our sector. Our team of 4,500 employees every day live our values of agility, trustworthiness and collaboration in how we support our 10,000+ customers. Learn more about how our enterprise software solutions can help your business today at ifs.com.

    Oracle's JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management solution helps drive greater value from your assets, whether they are plants, facilities, or equipment. From capital planning and budgeting, to procurement and operations, to maintenance and repair. Oracle's JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Capital Asset Management provides you with complete visibility into your assets. It gives you the information you need to make the financial and operational decisions that optimize equipment performance from deployment through operations, maintenance, and retirement. Capital Asset Management is fully integrated with other key JD Edwards EnterpriseOne applications, including those that support the management of human capital, finances, procurement, projects, and services and warranties.
    Sample Customers
    Carlsberg, Pukka, Aston Martin, Sky, China Airlines, Cimcorp, Mini, Pepsi.
    Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Label Technology Inc., The Conti Group, Roka Bioscience, Massimo Zanetti Beverage USA, City of Nashville
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company46%
    Educational Organization15%
    Transportation Company8%
    Training & Coaching Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government8%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise34%
    Large Enterprise28%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise60%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    IFS Cloud Platform vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IFS Cloud Platform vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IFS Cloud Platform is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Asset Management with 29 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is ranked 5th in Enterprise Asset Management with 4 reviews. IFS Cloud Platform is rated 7.8, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IFS Cloud Platform writes "Robust, customizable, and modern". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management writes "The product is reasonably priced and easy to set up, but the UI and UX need severe improvements". IFS Cloud Platform is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP S/4HANA, Oracle E-Business Suite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and IBM Maximo, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is most compared with IBM Maximo. See our IFS Cloud Platform vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management report.

    See our list of best Enterprise Asset Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.