"As we have used most of the MQ stub, "MQ recording" is the most useful feature."
"It has very easy and good validation techniques used for SWIFT, XSD, and WSDL validations."
"The initial setup is quite easy to manage."
"User friendliness: I would rate it somewhere around 5/10 in terms of user-friendliness. It can be simpler to build stubs and middle-ware based test cases compared to the solution given by RTVS."
"Reporting: In the recent release of RCPT, the "Usage graph" feature is included, but that still needs improvements in terms of UI and timeline filtering criteria."
"It would be ideal if the product offered more in terms of data virtualization or have a separate product that could be combined with this one that could offer a bit more in order to cover more of our requirements."
More IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server is ranked 5th in Service Virtualization while Parasoft Virtualize is ranked 4th in Service Virtualization. IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server is rated 8.0, while Parasoft Virtualize is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server writes "I would recommend it due to the robust infrastructure implementation and good technical support supporting standards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft Virtualize writes "Supports MessageQueue. Provides the ability to test applications detached from integration middleware". IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server is most compared with Broadcom Service Virtualization, whereas Parasoft Virtualize is most compared with Broadcom Service Virtualization and OpenText Service Virtualization.
See our list of best Service Virtualization vendors.
We monitor all Service Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.