IBM Security Guardium Data Protection vs Voltage SecureData Enterprise comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Security Guardium Data Protection and Voltage SecureData Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Database Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Security Guardium Data Protection vs. Voltage SecureData Enterprise Report (Updated: September 2022).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Our ability to see when users are accessing sensitive data.""It tests security to support SOX compliance.""The vulnerability assessment is a valuable feature.""It provides us regulatory compliance proof and evidence for audit.""Database logging and audit functions are the most valuable features.""I like the reporting mechanism. It's very good.""This is a multi-platform solution that consolidates everything and centralizes support for it.""It has been very difficult to analyze all the network traffic with something else. Guardium provides that feature, it's heuristic. So we have rule-based algorithms in place to take care of that."

More IBM Security Guardium Data Protection Pros →

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Voltage SecureData Enterprise is the ease of configuration and the group services rest API.""The number one feature I found was that the install was really easy, it was quite helpful."

More Voltage SecureData Enterprise Pros →

Cons
"Guardium Data Protection is far better in terms of external integration. But in terms of firewall features, like when you're blocking activities, it's as if Oracle AVDF simply has superior features. This is just from third-party observations, but the users of Oracle AVDF are saying that when it comes to the firewall and protection functionality, they're much more inclined to AVDF.""Right now we're having some issues where it's using a high CPU, we don't know why. So, better testing before the product is ready would help.""Sometimes the connectors to the databases need to be manually updated and we have to configure them again, which is something that should be improved.""The solution could be improved for NoSQL databases.""Guardium's storage capabilities could use some improvement. I'd also like to have some better integration using digital technology or a connector.""The integration part of the present solution is very complex and tedious. Plus it gives a lot of false positives which need to be eradicated over time.""Needs nore cloud support.""Setup can be complex. The documentation is in so many different locations, and a lot of times we have to leverage support and higher level resources to figure out the right steps to take."

More IBM Security Guardium Data Protection Cons →

"For a future release, the interface looks a bit dated and could be improved.""Micro Focus Voltage SecureData Enterprise can improve the types of encryptions. They are limited by the number of types of encryption and types of masking they are allowing. In the solution that we were using, the illustration interface and the number of capabilities in terms of data masking were limited."

More Voltage SecureData Enterprise Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We haven't talked much about pricing and licencing. But it is not cheap for sure"
  • "I would suggest to review the type of data, need for security, and if the organizational structure needs the options IBM Guardium provides."
  • "​If you are researching this type of solution, work with IBM."
  • "Guardium has not saved us time or money."
  • "The biggest challenge is the cost associated with the product, and the cost of maintaining. Everything is not translated directly to the benefits we see. There are benefits, yes, but if I were writing the check, would I buy Guardium? No."
  • "Guardium won mostly because of our scope and scale. It was able to perform at the scale that we wanted to use it. ​"
  • "The price of Guardium is higher than the main competitor, Imperva. In addition, it's complex as the calculation of the licensing is done by Processor Value Unit (PVU). However, before purchasing a DAP solution, it is important to analyze specific points to evaluate the cost-benefit of each tool. For example: Does the environment to be monitored have mainframes? If so, it's a point for Guardium. If not, a point for Imperva. Note: IBM is looking into a new licensing policy and reducing the price of Guardium."
  • "One of the deployments that I know of had three databases, and the yearly fees are approximately $50,000 USD."
  • More IBM Security Guardium Data Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I found some of their licensing is a bit complex. I am also finding that some of their cloud solutions are quite expensive."
  • More Voltage SecureData Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Security solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is a solution for database security from IBM that gives complete visibility, control, and analysis to secure sensitive data and comply with regulations IBM… more »
    Top Answer:It sends out an immediate alert when there's suspicious activity.
    Top Answer:IBM solutions have fair price strategy, and operates on a yearly basis. If it's a SaaS solution, then you can opt for yearly basis.
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Voltage SecureData Enterprise is the ease of configuration and the group services rest API.
    Top Answer:Micro Focus Voltage SecureData Enterprise can improve the types of encryptions. They are limited by the number of types of encryption and types of masking they are allowing. In the solution that we… more »
    Top Answer:I am using Micro Focus Voltage SecureData Enterprise for data masking. We are trying to hide some personal information from our customers. Micro Focus Voltage SecureData Enterprise is being used in… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 22 in Database Security
    Views
    6,560
    Comparisons
    3,241
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    450
    Rating
    8.4
    10th
    out of 28 in Endpoint Encryption
    Views
    654
    Comparisons
    239
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    405
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    InfoSphere Guardium, Guardium, IBM Guardium
    Micro Focus Voltage SecureData Enterprise, Micro Focus SecureData, Voltage, SecureData, Voltage SecureData
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM Security Guardium Data Protection automatically discovers and classifies sensitive data from across the enterprise, providing real-time data activity monitoring and advanced user behavior analytics to help discover unusual activity around sensitive data.

    Deploy the solution to help discover regulated data in your data stores and use pre-built templates for regulations such as PCI, SOX, HIPAA, CCPA and many more, to streamline and automate compliance workflows.

    Across industries-from compliance mandates such as PCI and GDPR to new IT initiatives such as data analytics and cloud migration-businesses rely on Voltage SecureData to secure their information at its core while at rest, in motion, and in use for comprehensive protection without gaps.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Epicor, Allegiant Travel Company, EnvisionRxOptions
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm40%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Insurance Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm28%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Government9%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company21%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise54%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise73%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    IBM Security Guardium Data Protection vs. Voltage SecureData Enterprise
    September 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Guardium Data Protection vs. Voltage SecureData Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: September 2022.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is ranked 1st in Database Security with 70 reviews while Voltage SecureData Enterprise is ranked 10th in Endpoint Encryption with 2 reviews. IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is rated 8.2, while Voltage SecureData Enterprise is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Security Guardium Data Protection writes "Provides visibility, has a single console that shows all information, and collector-aggregator capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Voltage SecureData Enterprise writes "Easy configuration, high availability, and excellent support". IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is most compared with Imperva SecureSphere Database Security, Oracle Audit Vault, Oracle Advanced Security, DataSunrise Database Security and Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting, whereas Voltage SecureData Enterprise is most compared with Protegrity Data Security, Oracle Advanced Security, Vormetric Application Crypto Suite, Digital Guardian and Microsoft BitLocker. See our IBM Security Guardium Data Protection vs. Voltage SecureData Enterprise report.

    We monitor all Database Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.