We performed a comparison between IBM Cloud Pak for Integration and Informatica Cloud Data Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."
"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."
"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."
"It is a stable solution."
"REST API: Excellent for scripting control and reporting mechanisms"
"The features I find most valuable is the synchronization, verification, functionalities and all the data integration features."
"It has become an easy way to exchange information through any cloud application."
"It has a more UI-based tool, and the scripting is good."
"The data mapping capability is a valuable feature."
"The mass ingestion functionality and the elasticity of the solution are great."
"It has all the advantages of the Cloud in that you can use it without worrying about infrastructure, upkeep, or upgrades."
"The serverless capability and the packaging application of the solution are valuable."
"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."
"The pricing can be improved."
"It needs to be a little more intuitive but it’s really not bad."
"Connectivity could be improved, it can be a little slow."
"Cost-wise, it could be better."
"There may be some types of limitations with the performance."
"Informatica Cloud Data Integration could improve the price by making it less expensive."
"I would also like to have profiling functionalities and quality transformations in the cloud."
"Certain shortcomings in the product's UI make it an area where improvements are required."
"The biggest challenge I see is the IDE's for the cloud and automization are different."
More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Informatica Cloud Data Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is ranked 14th in Cloud Data Integration with 4 reviews while Informatica Cloud Data Integration is ranked 5th in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is rated 8.6, while Informatica Cloud Data Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration writes "A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Data Integration writes "A stable, scalable, and user-friendly solution". IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is most compared with IBM App Connect, IBM API Connect, IBM DataPower Gateway, Microsoft Azure API Management and MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, whereas Informatica Cloud Data Integration is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Fivetran and Mule Anypoint Platform. See our IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Informatica Cloud Data Integration report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.