We performed a comparison between Goliath Performance Monitor and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."Offers a diversity of features."
"I like that it not only has the ability to monitor but that it can do a lot of specific Citrix monitoring."
"It is very easy to use and integrate. There are connectors for every technology."
"The most valuable feature is that it's very good for log aggregation."
"The level of robustness on offer is very good."
"It provides a risk score for each object, device, or user. We can then take action if they are at a higher risk."
"Splunk has significantly reduced the time in performing the task of aggregating logs, reviewing as well as time spent during investigations."
"The technical support has been very good. They are very responsive and have been helpful."
"It helps streamline troubleshooting and log analysis."
"The initial setup is really straightforward. It's one of the easiest installations."
"I would love to be able to tell what ISP the user is coming from."
"Issues with generating reports; consistency is not there."
"The biggest problem is data compression. Splunk is an outstanding product, but it is a resource hog. There should be better data compression for being able to maintain our data repositories. We end up having to buy lots of additional storage just to house our Splunk data. This is my only complaint about it."
"For on-premise, it's more about optimization. With such a heavy byte scale of data that we are operating on, the search for disparate data sometimes takes about a minute. This is understandable considering the amount of data that we are pumping into it. The only optimization that I recommend is better sharding, when it comes to Splunk, so that data retrieval can be faster."
"The Web Application Firewall will send you too much information because it's more dedicated to security than a normal firewall."
"The price of the solution could be cheaper."
"The complexity could be worked on so that it's even easier and faster."
"The GUI can be improved to include some of the capabilities that other BI solutions have."
"Enterprise security: Splunk must work on clarifying the solution to customers and explain how to gain more from it."
"The solution has a high learning curve for users. It's a little complicated when you're trying to figure out all the features and what they do."
Earn 20 points
Goliath Performance Monitor is ranked 59th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 2nd in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 221 reviews. Goliath Performance Monitor is rated 7.6, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Goliath Performance Monitor writes "Monitors well with Citrix, stable, and the support is very responsive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Goliath Performance Monitor is most compared with ControlUp, Zabbix and eG Enterprise, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.