Frontegg vs PingID comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Frontegg Logo
199 views|132 comparisons
Ping Identity Logo
2,208 views|1,841 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Frontegg and PingID based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Their developers were always willing to meet even though we are in very different time zones.""The MFA policy via Frontegg allows us to enable/disable/enforce the Multi-Factor Authentication policy of our users and to enhance security and adhere to modern standards.""It has Audit Log and many cool features that if we were to develop them by ourselves, it would require a lot of research and development resources. Frontegg gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system in which they can also manage some of the features and roles by themself which gives them more control over their environment.""We like the SSO, permissions and roles, multiple workspaces, and react login components.""The admin portal layer is super useful and saves valuable front-end development time.""Every feature is multi-tenant by design, making different customer requests effortless to provide."

More Frontegg Pros →

"The soundness of the solution is its most valuable feature. For example, if you are in our corporate network, you can log on without any traffic interfering.""The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging in.""I find the auto-discovery feature the most valuable. It helps us automate a lot of things using a single password across applications.""This is a user-friendly solution.""It provides ease of connecting all our devices.""What I like best about PingID is that it's very user-friendly. PingID is well-built as a developer tool and regularly upgrades and updates via patches. I also like that PingID has clear documents that will help you integrate it with other solutions.""The solution has a smooth and configurable user interface for single sign-on capabilities.""I like the self-service feature. The 502 and UBP systems are also excellent. PingID's ability to authenticate with SSH, RDP, and Windows login is pretty handy. It covers the entire spectrum of use."

More PingID Pros →

Cons
"The web interface is missing a way to delete a workspace. I have accidentally created a workspace and was not able to delete it. It's a minor thing that should be supported.""We're hoping to see more user management-related features, according to Frontegg's roadmap.""The PHP SDK is limited. It's not a huge deal as we can just use their web API directly, but it is something to note if you're using PHP.‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎""It would be nice to have a backup export with all tenant/users so that in case of a mistake we can have the option to restore the users.""Frontegg is fairly stable, however, we are looking forward to some promised capabilities, such as more tightly integrated Feature Flag support.""We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."

More Frontegg Cons →

"It has a long way to go until it is a cloud-based solution.""PingID should put a little more effort into making a pretty self-explanatory deck about their tech features and the services they offer.""PingID classifies the type of environment into internal and external, which is an area for improvement because you need to take additional steps to trust internal and external users.""The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.""The timing of the token validity, if it could be extended, would be great. I'm not sure if there is even an option to configure these types of settings.""They could use some bio-certification. It's just more user-friendly and more convenient than entering the one time passes. That would be an improvement.""I think that the connection with like Microsoft Word, especially for Office 365, is a weak point that could be improved.""PingID would benefit from a better user interface for integration."

More PingID Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."
  • "PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."
  • "The product is costly."
  • "The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."
  • More PingID Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.
    Top Answer:The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.
    Ranking
    30th
    Views
    199
    Comparisons
    132
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    7th
    Views
    2,208
    Comparisons
    1,841
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    573
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Auth0 logo
    Compared 85% of the time.
    Descope logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Okta Customer Identity logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Microsoft Entra ID logo
    Compared 27% of the time.
    ForgeRock logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    PingFederate logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    SailPoint IdentityIQ logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    RSA SecurID Access logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Ping Identity
    Learn More
    Overview

    Frontegg is a user management platform, designed for the Product-Led Growth (PLG) era. Frontegg provides blazing-fast integration of a powerful user infrastructure, designed to handle modern application use-cases.

    Our platform supports app builders by covering all the way from fundamental authentication flows to the most advanced capabilities such as complex organizational structures (multi-tenancy), fine-grained authorization, API-token management, self-service admin portal for end-users, subscription enforcement, single-sign-on (SSO), and much more.

    Frontegg’s interfaces are embedded as a UI layer within your app and becomes a customer-facing management interface for your end-users, both on the personal and workspace levels. Frontegg also powers-up your backend through rich SDKs supported in various languages and frameworks.

    Pricing: Starts at $249/m

    IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government11%
    Retailer6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company44%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business100%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise49%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise73%
    Buyer's Guide
    Authentication Systems
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Frontegg is ranked 30th in Authentication Systems while PingID is ranked 7th in Authentication Systems with 14 reviews. Frontegg is rated 9.6, while PingID is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Frontegg writes "Intuitive with reCaptcha integration and helpful technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PingID writes " A robust cloud-based multi-factor solution with a good customer support team". Frontegg is most compared with Auth0, Descope and Okta Customer Identity, whereas PingID is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, ForgeRock, PingFederate, SailPoint IdentityIQ and RSA SecurID Access.

    See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

    We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.