Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fortinet Penetration Testing Service vs Strike comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 28, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet Penetration Testin...
Ranking in Penetration Testing Services
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Strike
Ranking in Penetration Testing Services
15th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (60th)
 

Featured Reviews

João Carvalho - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration with existing systems saves time and streamlines operations
We use the Fortinet Penetration Testing Service because it was recommended by the company we work with The integration with Fortinet Security Fabric is perfect for us. It is also a time-saving solution because we have other solutions from Fortinet and the Fabric integration is beneficial for us.…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Penetration Testing Services solutions are best for your needs.
862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Fortinet Penetration Testing Service?
We use the Fortinet Penetration Testing Service ( /products/fortinet-penetration-testing-service-reviews ) because it was recommended by the company we work with.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

FortiGuard Pentest
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

edward jones, panasonic, steelcase, United Learning, Harry Rosen, Volkswagen Groupe Retail France
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about HackerOne, Pentera, Bugcrowd and others in Penetration Testing Services. Updated: June 2025.
862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.