We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiADC and Wallarm NG WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)."Simple to use and easy to integrate."
"The most valuable feature is the SSL offloading capacity."
"The main feature that we use is GSLB (Global Server Load Balancing). GSLB makes the customer's network more reliable by scaling applications across multiple datacenters. GSLB as a disaster recovery solution can direct traffic based on site availability."
"The GSLB, the DR side, is the best part. Because we had our main side in one city, we created another, and we had a complete MPLS over the internet. We used the GSLB and data loss for our business applications."
"Key features include SSL Offloading, VM availability, and L7 load balancing."
"TSL and SSL offloading are both very good features."
"From a technical perspective, it is the most scalable device from Fortinet."
"Ease of use in deploying and having it up and running requires minimal knowledge."
"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."
"The product's stability for VMs could be better."
"FortiADC is complex to configure so the interface should be improved."
"Setup could be easier. The company's homework is to redesign those menus to configure with the smallest number of steps."
"Issues with SSL and encrypted traffic."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"I think it would be helpful if Fortinet put more video examples on their cookbook site."
"Fortinet FortiADC should include an advanced-level SD-WAN."
"I had a terrible experience with Fortinet support. I only used support once when I bought the solution. I got no response for two days. However, I believe that it's no longer the case. Fortinet solutions have problems when they're launched. For example, we had issues with Fortinet's authenticator when it came out. We also had trouble with FortiNAC in the beginning."
"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."
Earn 20 points
Fortinet FortiADC is ranked 8th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 19 reviews while Wallarm NG WAF is ranked 32nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Fortinet FortiADC is rated 7.8, while Wallarm NG WAF is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiADC writes "High-level load balancing and routing protocols but scalability is limited to 200 gigabits". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wallarm NG WAF writes "Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us". Fortinet FortiADC is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Fortinet FortiWeb, Citrix NetScaler, Kemp LoadMaster and HAProxy, whereas Wallarm NG WAF is most compared with Salt Security, Noname Security, AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.