We performed a comparison between Forter and IBM Trusteer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."Dashboards, customization and the analytics are all good, it's user friendly."
"The features were pretty straightforward. I just used them as I went along with very little interference all the years that I have used it."
"Lacking granularity on the acceptance/rejection fraud options."
"After a Windows update, it started acting up. It blocked several programs. It became inactive after the Windows update and I had to remove Trusteer, allowing my computer to go back to its norm."
"I would like them to make it as user-friendly as possible. Simplicity is what we need. Load and go."
Forter is ranked 10th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while IBM Trusteer is ranked 12th in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Forter is rated 9.0, while IBM Trusteer is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Forter writes "Great at detecting fraudulent behavior and has reduced our financial losses". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Trusteer writes "The features were pretty straightforward". Forter is most compared with Riskified, Signifyd, Sift Digital Trust and Safety, Kount and ThreatMetrix, whereas IBM Trusteer is most compared with BioCatch, IBM Safer Payments, ThreatMetrix, F5 Shape Security and Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.