• Home
  • Trellix Network Detection and Response vs. Zscaler Cloud Sandbox [EOL]

Trellix Network Detection and Response vs Zscaler Cloud Sandbox [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Trellix Network Detection and Response and Zscaler Cloud Sandbox [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, ESET and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP).
To learn more, read our detailed Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Archie Scorgie
Blocks traffic and DDoS attacks
Use Zscaler Cloud Sandbox [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to competitors."
  • "The pricing is a little high."
  • "Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats. The company that I work with is a very mature organization, and we have seen the meantime to analysis decrease by at least tenfold."
  • "There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."
  • "We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."
  • "FireEye is comparable to other products, such as HX, but seems expensive. It may cause us to look at other products in the market."
  • "When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."
  • "The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."

    • More Trellix Network Detection and Response Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about FireEye Network Security?
    Top Answer:Over the thirteen years of using the product, we have not experienced a single compromise in our environment. During the COVID period, we faced numerous DDoS attacks, and the tool proved highly… more »
    Read all 23 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network S...
    Top Answer:The tool is a bit pricey.
    Read all 15 answers   →
    What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?
    Top Answer:Certain features in Trellix Network Detection and Response, such as using AL-type commands, may initially pose a challenge for those unfamiliar with such commands. However, once users become… more »
    Read all 23 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    9th
    out of 37 in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
    Views
    1,942
    Comparisons
    1,376
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    381
    Rating
    8.4
    Unranked
    In Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    FireEye Network Security, FireEye
    Learn More
    Trellix
    Video Not Available
    Zscaler
    Overview

    Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

    Today’s appliance-based sandboxing solutions are expensive and, therefore, typically installed only in the data center. When users leave the network, they become exposed to new threats because sandbox protection can’t follow them. Traditional sandboxes usually operate out of line, allowing traffic through while inspecting suspicious files in TAP mode. If a threat is detected in the sandbox, it sends alerts, but they can arrive too late. Traditional sandboxes also lack the ability to fully inspect SSL traffic due to hardware limitations—and many malware authors are exploiting those limitations to distribute their malicious payloads. In order to provide sandbox protection, organizations have bolted sandboxing solutions onto their existing security stacks. It helps, but achieving a fully integrated threat platform across multiple products is nearly impossible.

    For more details: https://www.zscaler.com/produc...

    Sample Customers
    FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
    Zenith Live, Azure, Carlsberg Group
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government9%
    University9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, ESET and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Trellix Network Detection and Response is ranked 9th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 35 reviews while Zscaler Cloud Sandbox [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Trellix Network Detection and Response is rated 8.6, while Zscaler Cloud Sandbox [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Trellix Network Detection and Response writes "Blocks traffic and DDoS attacks ". On the other hand, Trellix Network Detection and Response is most compared with Fortinet FortiSandbox, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Zscaler Internet Access, Fortinet FortiGate and Vectra AI, whereas Zscaler Cloud Sandbox [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

    We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.