We performed a comparison between EDB Postgres Replication Server and NetApp Snapshot based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication."The most valuable features of EDB Postgres Replication Server are the many in-built functionalities, such as streaming. When compared to others solutions it is highly secure and does not have any breakage in replication. The replication is very fast. Additionally, in other solutions, the databases need to have a lot of manual intervention but with EDB Postgres Replication Server it is not needed."
"The most important feature to us is creating live snapshots without impacting user access to the file. NetApp's processes are transparent to users and allow us to create point-in-time snapshots, enabling us to replicate that data into the cloud in real time without any impact."
"Compared to the traditional way we did backups, with Snapshot it takes us less time. It has improved my organization by saving us time."
"The solution is fast and it doesn't use any disc space at all. You can also take as many snapshots as you like. These are the solution's most valuable features."
"This mature product is the leader in the backup industry with unique features and capabilities for users with advanced backup needs."
"You never have to worry about maintaining millions of files stored across several thousands of virtual machines."
"NetApp Snapshot's most valuable features are the snapshot capabilities, you can take snaps of shared directories, files, and VMs."
"It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable features of NetApp Snapshot are the integration with other vendors and customization."
"We tried to set up a reverse master-master set up, but currently, it is not available. it can be done only via logical replication using a paid version of BDR or some other technology. They allow like master-master. MySQL has already supported master-master and streaming."
"Not a perfect ten because there is one point off to give it room for improvement."
"If your data is more dynamic and changes frequently, you need more granular retention levels and need to save it for a longer duration, then this becomes a real challenge."
"The licensing cost could be improved."
"NetApp needs to take a look at their pricing in comparison to the competition and make the appropriate change to attract more customers and gain in market share."
"The company could update their products more regularly."
"Although support is good, the global support is lacking depending on location."
"The next release should include developments on the step center for purpose or bandwidth."
"The price could be a bit lower."
More EDB Postgres Replication Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
EDB Postgres Replication Server is ranked 8th in Data Replication with 1 review while NetApp Snapshot is ranked 1st in Data Replication with 20 reviews. EDB Postgres Replication Server is rated 10.0, while NetApp Snapshot is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of EDB Postgres Replication Server writes "Beneficial continual replication, helpful support, and high replication performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp Snapshot writes "A highly scalable and mature solution that integrates well with other tools and provides excellent features". EDB Postgres Replication Server is most compared with JumpMind SymmetricDS and Equalum, whereas NetApp Snapshot is most compared with NetApp SnapMirror, Hitachi Thin Image Advanced, Dell AppSync, DDN DataFlow and Dell RecoverPoint.
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
