We performed a comparison between Denodo and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ability to connect to a lot of different sources."
"It can support a number of data sources, and it can pull flat files, from cloud-based databases or from those on-premises. Denodo can pull from any data source and interface with the view. Then, we can publish the view."
"It is easy to virtualize data using the solution."
"The most valuable features of Denodo are the extraction option for adapters, and there are many things for the views, that are cached. Denodo is not storing the data, it looks first to tune the query, and these things are for the agents."
"The logical data warehouse functionality is fantastic. It truly stands out. The ClearOptimizer and Virtual Cache are great features. They work together seamlessly to optimize performance."
"The most valuable features are data lineage and the concept of a semantic layer."
"It allows a lot of traceability and you can decide what data you want to collect"
"The performance and the speed to market are the most valuable features of this solution."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"The solution is scalable."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"Denodo can improve usage management-related aspects. If you deal with the mini views, it gets stuck. The performance is very slow when we go with a large number of views and high volume."
"The solution should have its own acceleration technology."
"It would be good if the solution provided a much-needed cellular platform."
"We can't scale it to meet digital requirements."
"Denodo's training documentation could be improved by providing more material. From an administrative standpoint, I've found that only Denodo websites provide the usual tutorials. It may be because it's a bit of a restricted tool, but it results in trouble with learning. Normally, I can find help and solutions from other sources, but I haven't been able to find any for Denodo. Other that, it's fine and it performs well. I only have six months of experience, so I can't accurately suggest improvements."
"We occasionally have some integration issues that we need to work through."
"Sometimes, Windows-related functions do not work properly in Denodo. The analytic functions in SQL do not work properly."
"There are a couple of areas that can be improved in Denodo. From a stability point of view, sometimes we see issues in the data management functionality. This only happens now and then, however, and usually takes place when we add in our own customization."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
Denodo is ranked 8th in Cloud Data Integration with 29 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 22nd in Cloud Data Integration with 7 reviews. Denodo is rated 7.8, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Denodo writes "Saves our underwriters' time with data virtualization, but could provide more learning resources". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". Denodo is most compared with Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Delphix, Mule Anypoint Platform and Informatica PowerCenter, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps. See our Denodo vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
