We performed a comparison between Denodo and Teradata QueryGrid based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."It allows a lot of traceability and you can decide what data you want to collect"
"Denodo makes it easy to export data as a service or data link to other services."
"The most valuable aspects of this solution are the short time frame in which you can deliver and connect."
"Data mining is one of the valuable features. We're able to connect all of the data sources with the installed driver, so that is a good advantage in Denodo. Being able to join the tables and view them is also valuable."
"The most valuable features are query optimization and the single language independence from the sources we're using to catch data."
"In general, it's good for us to make tests so we can scout the data."
"The most valuable features of Denodo are the extraction option for adapters, and there are many things for the views, that are cached. Denodo is not storing the data, it looks first to tune the query, and these things are for the agents."
"The most valuable feature is Data Catalogs."
"It is a highly robust software solution."
"Denodo can improve usage management-related aspects. If you deal with the mini views, it gets stuck. The performance is very slow when we go with a large number of views and high volume."
"The dropdown menus feel antiquated to me, and the administrative portals need improvement."
"The solution is slow when there are many virtualization layers."
"The feature that you have to connect on LDAP needs improvement."
"Lacks integrations with AWS, GCP and the like."
"I would like to see a connectivity option with third-party apps, for example, JDBC, and ODBC drivers. Currently, we need to install it separately from the Denodo side and then connect it."
"Sometimes, Windows-related functions do not work properly in Denodo. The analytic functions in SQL do not work properly."
"User-specific security at the column and row levels needs to be improved. Instead of applying security at every individual level, it would be better if it were at the group or tier level. It will save a lot of time."
"The primary challenge with Teradata lies in its cost structure, encompassing subscription fees, software licenses, and hardware expenses."
Denodo is ranked 12th in Data Integration with 29 reviews while Teradata QueryGrid is ranked 31st in Data Integration with 1 review. Denodo is rated 7.8, while Teradata QueryGrid is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Denodo writes "Saves our underwriters' time with data virtualization, but could provide more learning resources". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata QueryGrid writes "Unified and efficient query processing that seamlessly integrates and analyzes data from heterogeneous sources". Denodo is most compared with Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Delphix, Mule Anypoint Platform and SAP HANA, whereas Teradata QueryGrid is most compared with Teradata Data Mover and IBM InfoSphere DataStage.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
