We performed a comparison between Dell ProtectPoint [EOL] and Rubrik based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."The speed and the ease of the initial setup are both good. It is not complex."
"One of the features I find most valuable, is the good technical support."
"Rubrik is an easy and automatic solution that needs no manual intervention."
"There is a live-restore feature, their Live Mount, and the way it works we can instantly recover a VM, a past backup, to be directly attached to our VMware environment. Rubrik will act as a disk for it. It's like an instant restore. Within a few minutes our VM is up and running. And then, if we want to restore it, we can just migrate it to our actual storage."
"The ease of use and innovation are the features that stand out for us."
"Rubrik is cheap, and you get good performance."
"The most valuable feature is the Instant Recovery, where we can restore a VM or SQL database or any server or application, and have it up and running on their appliance within a few seconds."
"The most valuable features of Rubrik are the restoration and ease of use."
"The solution’s ransomware recovery, from a security perspective, is one of the biggest features of the product. We don't have to worry about the operational complexity of air-gapped backups and can rely more on the immutability approach. It is a highly valued feature in this solution."
"A reduced infrastructure complexity and fast to rack and go."
"The product has to be more mature, like to be another six to eight months on the market. A lot of maturity needs to be incorporated."
"The interface and documentation need to improve."
"Better integration for complex NAS structures having to mount at root adds time and workload to the process of NDMP."
"The solution needs to be more secure and needs to better protect against ransomware."
"They should give more access to the backend capabilities. From a customer point of view, you do not have access to all the features on the system. You have to engage their support to perform some of the tasks. It would be helpful for an experienced engineer to be able to go and do some of those tasks prior to contacting the support."
"The Office 365 protection could be improved."
"There is always room for improvement with some shortcuts for the web interface. They could make it even more beautiful."
"The solution could improve by having fewer VM Stuns."
"We would like to be able to do granular restores directly from Exchange. Also, more granular management of VM backups would help."
"The web interface could benefit from some improvement, particularly in terms of alerting and dashboard clarity. The cloud web interface is somewhat confusing and could use more development attention. Additionally, it's essential to ensure that local on-premise management options remain available alongside cloud-based solutions, as internet availability can affect backup management. Regarding features, cross-hypervisor restore functionality would be a valuable addition, allowing for greater flexibility in restoring VMs across different environments."
Earn 20 points
Dell ProtectPoint [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Backup and Recovery while Rubrik is ranked 4th in Backup and Recovery with 82 reviews. Dell ProtectPoint [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Rubrik is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Dell ProtectPoint [EOL] writes "Speedy and easy setup but it needs to mature ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rubrik writes "Easy to use with minimal training required, innovative, good support". Dell ProtectPoint [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Rubrik is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault Cloud, Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) and Zerto.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.