We performed a comparison between Dell CloudIQ and HPE OneView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best thing about this solution is that you can check for the infrastructure and system updates that you might need to be compliant with the Cloud."
"The tool for forecasting capacity is valuable."
"Mobile application is the most valuable feature for us. We can monitor all the storages on our phones. It's really good."
"Has really nice roll-up dashboards."
"Fewer vulnerabilities have been observed in the four years we have used the solution."
"We cannot function without this solution. "
"Have a single plane of glass across all of the server platforms."
"The OneView Global Dashboard is very user-friendly and it can be used for monitoring the power consumption and temperature of the data center and racks."
"Comprehensive dashboard, ease of use are key features."
"It gives us a view of all our servers, which we did not have before in real-time."
"Firmware compliance is one of the most valuable features."
"The best part is that you can integrate a two-way network. Earlier we could not manage the storage and ToR switch. Now we can create a LAN with our storage without any interface. In terms of switch management, it is now easy to understand the current configuration. It provides centralized management. It provides a single pane, and you can easily do all updates in one shot. It is a great product."
"Administration-wise it's going to be easier. More smooth and more flexible."
"The reporting capabilities of this solution could be improved."
"Doesn't do well in terms of integrating with technologies other than Dell."
"In terms of improvement, they should enhance the product range."
"Supporting legacy systems is an area that can be improved."
"PowerScale is the only file system offered and that is limiting."
"One thing which is missing is that you can't actually log a support call yourself."
"The interface is a bit bland. It does its job, but it could have a better interface."
"The network configuration part of HPE OneView needs improvement. The solution has way too many features, and there's a need for proper configuration indicators to be put in place."
"I have to chop it up into smaller parts, because I have an installation in Europe and it covers the whole world. That is not so good. They need to be more localized, so I am going to chop it up into smaller bits."
"Does not allow for switch configuration other than through OneView."
"I think HPE could make more user-friendly interfaces, exclude Java and move to an HTML5 platform, make more detailed documentation, and lower the price."
"I would like to see support for things that aren't in the current generation. We have a lot of 7th and 8th generation hardware."
"The solution could add storage, integration services, and end-to-end support for Cisco switches or other competitor products."
Dell CloudIQ is ranked 41st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 5 reviews while HPE OneView is ranked 17th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 80 reviews. Dell CloudIQ is rated 7.8, while HPE OneView is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Dell CloudIQ writes "Easily visualize your environment's performance and forecast its capacity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE OneView writes "Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO". Dell CloudIQ is most compared with Cisco Intersight, Moogsoft, Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator, NetApp Cloud Insights and Zabbix, whereas HPE OneView is most compared with Cisco Intersight, Zabbix, SolarWinds NPM, Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator and ServiceNow IT Operations Management. See our Dell CloudIQ vs. HPE OneView report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
