We performed a comparison between Dell CloudIQ and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."Has really nice roll-up dashboards."
"The tool for forecasting capacity is valuable."
"The best thing about this solution is that you can check for the infrastructure and system updates that you might need to be compliant with the Cloud."
"Mobile application is the most valuable feature for us. We can monitor all the storages on our phones. It's really good."
"Fewer vulnerabilities have been observed in the four years we have used the solution."
"Its huge, versatile AppBase helped me to configure and bring data from different sources to a unified platform."
"The level of robustness on offer is very good."
"It has reduced the time to resolution, time to investigate, and time to troubleshoot for debugging issues."
"Correlating data across different systems via one interface will allow you to know your environment or identify incident data in ways you never imagined."
"It's better than IBM, in my opinion, because it's an independent entity."
"On the cloud, we are pushing through less than half a petabyte of data. So far, it has been fairly stable because it runs on all the underlying AWS infrastructures."
"It allows for transparency into IT metrics for insightful business analytics."
"The most valuable features of the solution are it is straightforward to use and the documentation is good for finding out how to get the data you are looking for."
"The reporting capabilities of this solution could be improved."
"In terms of improvement, they should enhance the product range."
"Doesn't do well in terms of integrating with technologies other than Dell."
"Supporting legacy systems is an area that can be improved."
"PowerScale is the only file system offered and that is limiting."
"The solution could improve by making it more business analysis oriented. The way it is now is designed more for developers."
"We usually have to follow up with technical support on our open cases."
"Splunk could add more ways to manage archiving and storage. There isn't a web interface. You can do this on the SaaS version, but the on-premise platform doesn't have this option. It has other things but no option for remote NAS. I would like to have a personal web interface where I can specify how long logs should be stored. To have this readily available on the web, you need to adjust some settings on the backend. That is tricky."
"The integration with all our tool sets felt like we were reinventing the wheel, which was a pain point for us."
"Our two main complaints are about the difficulty of the initial setup and the licensing model."
"We find that the maintenance process could be a lot better."
"The solution could improve by increasing the performance. We have run into problems when large amounts of data are processed."
"The UI can be difficult to understand for non-technical people."
Dell CloudIQ is ranked 41st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 5 reviews while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 2nd in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 228 reviews. Dell CloudIQ is rated 7.8, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Dell CloudIQ writes "Easily visualize your environment's performance and forecast its capacity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Dell CloudIQ is most compared with HPE OneView, Cisco Intersight, Moogsoft, Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator and Datadog, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel and Elastic Security.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.