We performed a comparison between Delinea Privileged Access Service and Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."This is a cloud-based application, which makes it very easy to deploy."
"The reporting is excellent."
"Delinea Privileged Access Service's UI part was very user-friendly for secure credential storage and management."
"The most valuable feature of Delinea Privileged Access Service is we can use the server as a jump host. It is simple to manage the accounts on the system."
"There are benefits in the security realm. We use Delinea at an enterprise level. I imagine there are productivity gains, but moreover, it's the security. We don’t enable staff to see the passwords of boxes but it's all being tracked and logged now."
"The solution is flexible."
"The vault and auditing capabilities are the most valuable feature because they include multiple reports that allow us to create our own reports."
"The most valuable feature is the author's discovery of assets."
"If you using IGA or access controls solutions then this solution is a good addon. Once Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager is set up it does not require a lot of maintenance or attention."
"Although the interface is intuitive, it could be a little more user-friendly."
"I would like for there to be a suitable solution to deploy a low-spec version for desktop password management to all our staff."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"There needs to be a notification when a password is near expiration."
"Enhancing the solution by incorporating additional features to make it comprehensive would be beneficial. It would be more convenient to have a complete package solution that consolidates all the features in one place, making it easier to manage. Currently, I am required to access two separate servers for reports, which could be avoided if all the necessary features were available in a single location. This would be highly advantageous for managing everything effectively."
"The integration with sync could be improved."
"This solution needs better integration with third-party solutions because their ability to support other tools is very weak."
"The pricing and presence could be improved."
"Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager is cumbersome and it does not operate by itself and relies on other solutions. Overall the way you configure things is a bit awkward compared to other solutions, such as Cyberark and Thycotic. The interface could be more intuitive, some features I expected to be easily accessible I had to search around for them. There needs to be more centralization."
More Delinea Privileged Access Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Delinea Privileged Access Service is ranked 12th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 9 reviews while Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Delinea Privileged Access Service is rated 7.6, while Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Delinea Privileged Access Service writes "Simple account management, high availability, and helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] writes "Responsive support, requires little maintenance, but configuration could be easier". Delinea Privileged Access Service is most compared with Azure Key Vault, Delinea Secret Server, Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management, SAP Identity Management and SailPoint IdentityIQ, whereas Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.