We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and Trellix Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The department management aspect of the solution is the most valuable aspect."
"The product is stable."
"We were able to reduce the number of privileged accounts by 50%, which helped to simplify our privileged access management environment."
"I like that you can remove the admin rights from the user's computer and have control over the environment. That means you can delete the local admins and grant them proper privileges with the console. So, they will get proper permissions for applications they need, but we don't have to do it. In the domain where we don't have control, the user can only do specified actions, but not all of them."
"This is the number one product for privilege account security."
"What sets CyberArk apart is its continuous innovation, staying ahead of the competition."
"The solution allows me to give access and privileges to each user individually"
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is very easy to manage, which I like. The solution also has a dashboard where you can see which software is suspicious, which I find valuable."
"The solution is broken down into different components from the portals. Web filtering, which is an added feature has been great for us."
"Communication with all Mcafee products (also 3rd parties) by DXL infrastructure."
"The manageability of the product itself is its most valuable aspect. You have the underlying EPO, and on top of it, you can deploy the various components as you require. This is unlike other solutions like Symantec where you have to deploy everything or nothing. With this solution, you can choose to only deploy antivirus or only deploy a firewall, or only something else. I choose the components and that deployment is done through EPO. It makes manageability very flexible."
"I think the costing is fine compared to other products. Cost-wise you definitely get value for your money."
"The most valuable features are the prevention layer that detects the signature value and prevents threats in the network."
"The package of protection that it provides is useful. It has antivirus, malware protection, VPN, and a whole bunch of other features."
"We receive good protection with this solution."
"The most valuable features are reporting from the ePO console and the advanced threat protection (ATP)."
"It cannot be on-prem. It is only cloud-based. Sometimes, that's a restriction in terms of usage."
"The solution's pricing could be better."
"Technical support is slow to respond when we run into issues."
"One area that has room for improvement is in managing the credentials for network devices."
"The product needs a streamlined user interface; improvements to the user interface can enhance user experience and make the solution more intuitive to navigate."
"It's an old product and has many areas that can be improved."
"The tool should be more user-friendly."
"Performance could be better. We have a couple of problems with CyberArk right now. One of the problems is performance in our environment. Support also takes a long time to respond. If the user already has local admin rights, then I can't collect any events in the console from this device. There are also some options in CyberArk that are not working properly, and are not helpful in this case. I can't collect any information to create a proper policy for the device. I have to investigate everything manually, or even disable the local admin from the device. I can collect the events only after this, and it's very time consuming. In my case, it's a waste of resources."
"We have a lot of problems with the user experience and it's difficult to implement. MacAfee's better than the ancient anti-virus solutions but it's a little slow to resolve. Many files with malware were destroyed through the network, and MacAfee doesn't detect anything."
"I would like to see more integration with third-party products."
"One of the drawbacks is that it is not 100% secure."
"The resolution time should be faster."
"Tech support is not as helpful as they were in the past."
"We don't like the solution since it requires much memory consumption and consumes much CPU resources."
"Technical support from the vendor is very bad."
"It would be nice if the solution was a bit more stable."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 7th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 25 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 12th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 94 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.0, while Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Symantec Endpoint Security, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Deep Security. See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Trellix Endpoint Security report.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.