We performed a comparison between CrowdStrike Falcon and Uptycs based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SentinelOne, CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Networks and others in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)."The most valuable feature of all is the full integration with the rest of the software in the operating system and Office 365, as well as Microsoft SCCM. It is quite easy for us to work with the whole instance of Microsoft products. This integration improves the benefits of the whole suite of products."
"I like that it's fully integrated with Windows, Microsoft 365 Exchange Online, and Outlook. It is better than other antivirus solutions because it's fully integrated with all Microsoft products. It's easy to integrate them and onboard all Windows devices from SCCM."
"Its most significant advantage lies in its affordability."
"Microsoft Defender XDR is scalable."
"Setting up Microsoft 365 Defender is easy. It's a user-friendly solution that provides threat protection. It has good stability and scalability."
"The visibility into threats is also very impressive because Microsoft helps you predict things and provides analytics to help you really improve your security. And all of this technology works across the domain, so it is pretty helpful in terms of threat analytics."
"Defender is easy to use. It has a nice console, and everything is all in one place."
"The incident threat response and its ability to facilitate effective remediation against threats are the standout features."
"The EDR and XDR features have been most valuable."
"Enables us to understand what processes are running on the system, what registry keys have been enabled."
"It's very easy to set up."
"The malware protection is the most valuable feature of CrowdStrike Falcon."
"We are happy with CloudStrike's ease of use and touch notification."
"Scalability hasn't been an issue for us."
"The most valuable features of CrowdStrike Falcon include Falcon Fusion workflows and endpoint detection capabilities."
"The most valuable feature is the indicator of compromise, which show you what file was either quarantined or removed."
"They have multiple great features."
"It would be beneficial to have a more seamless experience with everything consolidated in one place, particularly when dealing with aspects related to the Exchange console."
"When we do investigations, it would be better if Microsoft could populate the host dashboard more. When we open any host for investigation, we want the entire timeline of what is happening on the host, including all the users logging in, their hardware, Windows version, etc."
"The only problem I find is that the use cases are built-in. There is no template available that you can modify according to your organization's standards. What they give is very generic, the market standard, but that might not be applicable to every organization."
"I would like more of the features in Defender for 365 to be included in the smaller licenses. Even if I buy a small license and don't need everything, security shouldn't be a question. Security is one of the main aspects of all projects from our side, so it would be nice to have more features in the smaller licenses."
"I personally have not seen much evidence of how Defender can enhance the story of zero trust for enterprises."
"In the Microsoft Azure Portal, in Active Directory, if there is anything on the user it will provide you with the information, but you still have to go through it a bit. And sometimes, I have experienced difficulties in understanding the information, especially because the synchronization between Microsoft Intune and the devices that are connected to the user in Azure Active Directory takes a lot of time."
"The console is missing some features that would be helpful for a managed services provider, like device and user management."
"The support from Microsoft could improve. There are times I have to wait for a response from a qualified specialist."
"In a future release, I would like to see more integrations for data breaches and security features."
"CrowdStrike Falcon could improve if it became an XDR. When we look only to an end-point, we lost the context of the environment. I know it's another line of design of the product. However, if CrowdStrike becomes an XDR, it could be very good."
"Falcon could be improved with more function on the mobile end of things and better optimization with mobile devices."
"The management reporting functionality needs to be improved."
"Unfortunately, native applications are not supported."
"We would like to be able to perform on-demand scanning, rather than relying on the scheduler."
"The technical support could improve because I am in India and the support I receive is from the UK or Australia. It is difficult to manage the time difference. The service could be faster. However, when we do have the support they are knowledgeable."
"I would like CrowdStrike to provide some correlation in the threat analysis, so we can visualize things better."
"We end up facing a lot of issues after upgrades."
CrowdStrike Falcon is ranked 2nd in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 104 reviews while Uptycs is ranked 24th in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 1 review. CrowdStrike Falcon is rated 8.6, while Uptycs is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CrowdStrike Falcon writes "Easy to set up with good behavior-based analysis but needs a single-click recovery option". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Uptycs writes "Great features, good support, and lots of functionality". CrowdStrike Falcon is most compared with Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Micro Deep Security, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Trend Vision One, whereas Uptycs is most compared with Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Wiz, Lacework, Orca Security and Tenable.io Container Security.
See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors, best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors, and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
