We performed a comparison between Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)."The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"The stability of this product is very good."
"The product's most valuable features are massive user and feature intelligence exploit detection."
"They did what they said. This solution could apply to any scenario."
"The most valuable feature of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is the low consumption of system resources. The solution uses a lot of AI and machine learning."
"It blocks malicious files. It prevents attacks. It doesn't require many updates, it's a very light application."
"Cortex covers everything I need. It's a perfect solution. Cortex provides a different level of visibility because it's an extended EDR, allowing you to grab logs from the network and firewalls. Palo Alto invented the concept of the extended EDR or XDR."
"The dashboard is customizable."
"The interface is easy to use and it is more up to date than our previous solution."
"Its customer service is quite good."
"It is easy to manage."
"Encryption is the most valuable feature. It creates an encryption tunnel from your location to the delivery address."
"The pricing is decent."
"Has some great features not available elsewhere."
"The solution provides high-end security that is critical for financial institutions and bankers."
"EDR's most valuable feature is its basic protection from malware and viruses."
"The product is very easy to use."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pros →
"The solution is not stable."
"The support needs improvement."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"It'll help if customization was easier."
"I would like to see them include NDR (Network Detection Response)."
"The solution should force customers to integrate with network traffic to see the full benefits of XDR."
"I would like to see some additional features related to email protection included."
"There is a severe gap in functionality between Windows, Linux, and Mac versions. For example all folder restriction settings are Windows only. Traps 5.0+ does not have SAML / LDAP integration."
"The product's pricing needs improvement. They could provide more discounts. Additionally, the dashboard and control panel could be enhanced."
"It should support more mobile operating systems. That is one of the cons of their infrastructure right now."
"If they had pulse rate detection, it would be better."
"The system can be heavy, slowing down performance."
"It's not a simple implementation."
"My opinion is that behavior detection could work better. This feature gets a high rate of false positives."
"The solution does not offer much support to its users in Spanish, so I would like to see them offer more support in Spanish."
"Device control is lacking in EDR."
"I would like to integrate Kaspersky with my Log Collector SIEM. Right now that's not possible."
"The prices can go down a little bit."
"The installation process could be more streamlined."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Cons →
More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 4th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 80 reviews while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is ranked 17th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 44 reviews. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.4, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks writes "It provides a whole new level of visibility and integrates with most other vendors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert writes "Solid security and performance; overall a useful tool". Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Darktrace, Symantec Endpoint Security and SentinelOne Singularity Complete, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is most compared with Trend Vision One, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Cynet, Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response and WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.