We performed a comparison between Coralogix and New Relic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"It is easier to create new dashboards in the New Relic interface, and it is also easier to query if when I want to monitor a different parameter or time duration on my dashboard."
"The solution is good for sending alerts, drawing graphs about system usage, and creating plug-ins."
"We are able to drill down and see what is going on in the system."
"We use it for monitoring, identifying when services go down, or when they are outside of what we would consider normal operations."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to receive in-depth information about applications. It can detect a lot of important information."
"They instrument up from the bottom to the top – every piece of code - they have a very perfect read of what’s being done, and how long it’s taking."
"The simplicity of the dashboard is very good."
"New Relic has helped us in terms of the optimizing our print and loading times."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"The deployment process could be improved."
"The browser isn't exactly reliable."
"Some AIOps are missing in New Relic APS, and I would like to see more features in this area."
"Compared to their competitors, they are missing some features at the moment."
"New Relic needs to improve is the user data schema."
"The connectivity between legacy and newer cloud applications is not great."
"They need to improve the alerting and dashboarding as these are the key features in DevOps."
"They don't have an opportunity to share the dashboard with the public. If you want to share it with stakeholders or people outside the organization who just want to have a look at a couple of metrics, you can't do that without onboarding them to the product itself."
Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews while New Relic is ranked 3rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 151 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while New Relic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Grafana, Sentry, Elastic Search and Logz.io, whereas New Relic is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana and Azure Monitor. See our Coralogix vs. New Relic report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
